首页> 外文期刊>Cytometry, Part B. Clinical cytometry: the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology >Flow cytometry aneuploidy and cell cycle indexing as a possible tool for differentiating between CD10(+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma
【24h】

Flow cytometry aneuploidy and cell cycle indexing as a possible tool for differentiating between CD10(+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma

机译:流式细胞术术和细胞周期指数作为用于区分CD10(+)弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤和滤泡淋巴瘤之间的可能工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Differential diagnosis between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) becomes a challenge when adequate biopsy is unavailable. The present study aimed to investigate the applicability of DNA cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry (FC) for differentiating between CD10(+) DLBCL and FL. Methods Data were collected from 57 specimens where CD5(-)/CD10(+)/light chain restricted B cells were detected. DNA staining was performed using the Coulter DNA Prep Kit. Cell cycle fractions were evaluated by automatic analysis using the ModFit LT software. Results Histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of CD10(+) FL in 30 specimens (52.6%), CD10(+) DLBCL in 24 specimens (42.1%), and CD10(+) Burkitt lymphoma in 3 specimens (5.3%). A significantly higher rate of DNA aneuploidy was detected among CD10(+) DLBCL than FL specimens (50 vs. 13.3% respectively, p = .003). Likewise, DNA index was significantly higher in CD10(+) DLBCL relative to FL (1.26 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.04 +/- 0.16 respectively, p = .004). Notably, the proportion of cells in the S-phase and proliferative fraction was significantly higher in CD10(+) DLBCL than in CD10(+) FL (S-phase: 15.97 +/- 13.94 vs. 4.43 +/- 4.41 mean +/- SD, respectively, p < .0001; proliferative fraction: 18.87 +/- 15.17 vs. 5.78 +/- 7.04 mean +/- SD, respectively, p = .0001). Using a receiver operating characteristic analysis, optimal cutoffs for S-phase >= 7% and proliferative fraction >= 9% were determined. These values could be used to differentiate between CD10(+) DLBCL and CD10(+) FL. Conclusion Including DNA cell cycle analysis in the FC lymphoma assessment panel may be of diagnostic value in differentiating between CD10+ DLBCL and FL when adequate biopsy is unavailable.
机译:背景技术在足够的活检不可用时,弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)和滤饼淋巴瘤(FL)之间的鉴别诊断成为挑战。本研究旨在探讨DNA细胞周期分析对流式细胞术(Fc)进行DNA细胞循环分析的适用性,以区分CD10(+)DLBCL和FL。方法从57种样品中收集数据,其中检测到CD5( - )/ CD10(+)/轻链限制B细胞。使用Coulter DNA预备试剂盒进行DNA染色。通过使用ModFit LT软件通过自动分析评估细胞周期级分。结果组织病理学分析证实了在3个标本(42.1%)中的30个标本(52.6%),CD10(+)DLBC1中的CD10(+)氟,CD10(+)卷曲淋巴瘤3种标本(5.3%)。在CD10(+)DLBCL中检测到比FL标本在CD10(+)DLBCL中明显较高的DNA非核酸速率(分别为53.3%,P = .003)。同样地,DNA指数在CD10(+)DLBCL中显着高于FL(1.26 +/- 0.35与1.04 +/- 0.16,P = .004)。值得注意的是,在CD10(+)DLBCL中,S相和增殖级分中的细胞比例显着高于CD10(+)FL(S-阶段:15.97 +/- 13.94与4.43 +/- 4.41平均值+ / - SD分别P <.0001;增殖分数:18.87 +/- 15.17与5.78 +/- 7.04平均值+/- SD,P = .0001)。使用接收器操作特性分析,确定S相的最佳截止值= 7%,并测定增殖率= 9%。这些值可用于区分CD10(+)DLBCL和CD10(+)FL。结论在适当的活检不可用时,FC淋巴瘤评估面板中的DNA细胞循环分析包括在CD10 + DLBCL和FL之间的诊断值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号