...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Teaching sexual history-taking: a systematic review of educational programs.
【24h】

Teaching sexual history-taking: a systematic review of educational programs.

机译:教学历史 - 采取教育课程:对教育计划的系统审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Because of the importance of sexual history-taking, the authors attempted to identify all randomized controlled trials on teaching this topic and reviewed the methods used for teaching and the efficacy of the educational interventions. METHOD: From June to November 2010, the authors searched the published English-language literature indexed in PubMed, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS, using the key terms sexual history-taking, teaching, medical students, residents, sexual health, sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and AIDS. The authors selected and critically appraised randomized controlled trials and controlled nonrandomized trials of educational programs designed to enhance sexual history-taking skills. RESULTS: Of 11 trials identified, 7 included medical students, 2 included residents, 1 involved community-based physicians, and 1 involved attendings, fellows, and residents. The educational interventions and outcome measures were heterogeneous, and the quality of study methodologies varied widely. The authors judged only 1 study to be of very high quality, although 8 studies explicitly mentioned at least one of the following: group differences at baseline, blinding, follow-up, and validated measurement tools. In the highest-quality study, primary care physicians who were mailed educational materials and received an unannounced instructor visit performed better in risk assessment and counseling than two comparison groups. Evidence also supported interactive workshops over didactic presentations. CONCLUSIONS: The dearth of high-quality controlled studies hampers the development of sexual history-taking curricula for medical students and residents. The available literature supports formal opportunities to directly practice and receive feedback on interviewing skills. More rigorous research on sexual history-taking education is needed.
机译:目的:由于性询问病史的重要性,作者试图找出教学这一主题,回顾用于教学和教育干预的有效性的方法,所有随机对照试验。方法:从六月到2010年11月,笔者搜索发布的英文文献在考研,PsycINFO和SCOPUS索引,使用关键术语的性病史询问,教学,医学学生,居民,性健康,性传播疾病,艾滋病和艾滋病。选择和批判性地对笔者随机对照试验,并旨在提高性病史采集技能教育计划控制的非随机试验。结果:确定了11个试验中,7根包括医学生,2个包括居民,1参与社区医生和1名介入主治医生,研究员,和居民。教育干预措施和成果的措施是异类,和学习方法的质量差别很大。笔者判断只有1个研究是非常优质的,尽管8个研究明确提及以下的至少一个:在基准组差异,致盲,跟进,并验证测量工具。在最高质量的研究,谁邮寄教材并获得了未经宣布的访问讲师初级保健医生在风险评估中表现得更好,比两个比较团体辅导。证据还支持互动研讨会上介绍的说教。结论:高品质控制研究的缺乏阻碍性病史采集课程的医学学生和居民的发展。现有的文献支持正规的机会,直接实践和面试技巧的反馈。需要对性病史采集教育更严谨的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号