首页> 外文期刊>Accreditation and quality assurance >Food safety management systems based on ISO 22000:2018 methodology of hazard analysis compared to ISO 22000:2005
【24h】

Food safety management systems based on ISO 22000:2018 methodology of hazard analysis compared to ISO 22000:2005

机译:基于ISO 22000的食品安全管理系统:2018危险分析方法与ISO 22000:2005相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the difference of the methodologies between ISO 22000:2005 and ISO 22000:2018. Compared to the methodology of food safety management system ISO 22000:2005, the methodology of ISO 22000:2018 has not been seen yet. The methodology established in this study was based on the differences of ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 22000:2005 and the abundant experiences of author toward the counseling of verification. The high-level structural management of ISO 22000:2018 can be integrated with other management systems. The risk which was assessed through the severity and possibilities could be converted into an opportunity according to the new method of risk evaluation of ISO 22000:2018 based on the CODEX HACCP. Relatedly, through the implementation of the HACCP system, the key regulatory terms relevant for adherence to ISO 22000:2018 have been added and revised. In particular, the new regulations state that the members of food safety management committees must either possess the expertise required to determine hazards or seek the assistance of outside experts when necessary. This regulation must be effectively implemented in the FSMS of small- and medium-sized enterprises throughout the world. In addition, the key terms and definitions of ISO 22000:2018 such as critical control points, prerequisite programs, and operation prerequisite programs are more clearly defined and consistent with the standard operating procedures of effective food safety management systems. ISO 22000:2018 also pays greater attention to the two "plan, do, check, action" (PDCA) cycles including food safety management system and food safety level. These two PDCA cycles emphasize the need for independent operation but should also be implemented such that they have close synergy and harmony with each other. This methodology was used for the verification of ISO 22000:2018 of seven factories.
机译:本研究的目的是比较ISO 22000:2005和ISO 22000:2018之间的方法之间的差异。与食品安全管理系统的方法相比ISO 22000:2005,尚未见解ISO 22000:2018的方法。本研究中建立的方法是基于ISO 22000:2018和ISO 22000:2005的差异以及作者对核查咨询的丰富经验。 ISO 22000:2018的高级结构管理可以与其他管理系统集成。通过严重程度和可能性评估的风险可以根据基于Codex HACCP的ISO 22000:2018的ISO 22000:2018的新风险评估方法转换为机会。相关的是,通过实施HACCP系统,已增加和修订与遵守ISO 22000:2018相关的关键监管术语。特别是,新的法规状况说,食品安全管理委员会成员必须具备确定危害所需的专业知识或在必要时寻求外部专家的协助。必须在全球中小企业的FSMS中有效地实施该规定。此外,ISO 22000:2018的关键术语和定义如关键控制点,先决条件计划和操作先决条件计划更明确地定义,并与有效食品安全管理系统的标准操作程序一致。 ISO 22000:2018还要更多地关注两个“计划,做,检查,行动”(PDCA)周期,包括食品安全管理系统和食品安全水平。这两个PDCA周期强调了对独立操作的需求,但也应该实施,使得他们彼此拥有近距离协同和谐。该方法用于核实ISO 22000:2018的七种工厂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号