...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Pollution Reports >Integrated Assessment of Left Ventricular Electrical Activation and Myocardial Strain Mapping in Heart Failure Patients
【24h】

Integrated Assessment of Left Ventricular Electrical Activation and Myocardial Strain Mapping in Heart Failure Patients

机译:心力衰竭患者左心室电激活和心肌应变映射的综合评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectivesThis study sought to test the accuracy of strain measurements based on anatomo-electromechanical mapping (AEMM) measurements compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tagging, to evaluate the diagnostic value of AEMM-based strain measurements in the assessment of myocardial viability, and the additional value of AEMM over peak-to-peak local voltages.BackgroundThe in?vivo identification of viable tissue, evaluation of mechanical contraction, and simultaneous left ventricular activation is currently achieved using multiple complementary techniques.MethodsIn 33 patients, AEMM maps (NOGA XP, Biologic Delivery Systems, Division of Biosense Webster, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Irwindale, California) and MRI images (Siemens 3T, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) were obtained within 1 month. MRI tagging was used to determine circumferential strain (Ecc) and delayed enhancement to obtain local scar extent (%). Custom software was used to measure Eccand local area strain (LAS) from the motion field of the AEMM catheter tip.ResultsIntertechnique agreement for Eccwas good (R2?= 0.80), with nonsignificant bias (0.01 strain units) and narrow limits of agreement (?0.03 to 0.06). Scar segments showed lower absolute strain amplitudes compared with nonscar segments: Ecc(median [first to third quartile]: nonscar ?0.10 [?0.15 to ?0.06] vs. scar ?0.04 [?0.06 to ?0.02]) and LAS (?0.20 [?0.27 to ?0.14] vs. ?0.09 [?0.14 to ?0.06]). AEMM strains accurately discriminated between scar and nonscar segments, in particular LAS (area under the curve: 0.84, accuracy?= 0.76), which was superior to peak-to-peak voltages (nonscar 9.5 [6.5 to 13.3] mV vs. scar 5.6 [3.4 to 8.3] mV; area under the curve: 0.75). Combination of LAS and peak-to-peak voltages resulted in 86% accuracy.ConclusionsAn integrated AEMM approach can accurately determine local deformation and correlates with the scar extent. This approach has potential immediate application in the diagnosis, delivery of intracardiac therapies, and their?intraprocedural evaluation.Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted
机译:与磁共振成像(MRI)标签相比,基于解剖学 - 机电映射(AEMM)测量的应变测量精度试图测试基于磁共振成像(MRI)标记的测量测量的准确性,以评估AEMM基应变测量在评估心肌活力的情况下的诊断价值,以及AEMM在峰值峰值局部电压上的额外值。使用多种互补技术,目前实现了βvivo鉴定活组织,机械收缩评估和同时左心室激活..Hethodsin 33患者,AEMM地图(Noga XP, 1个月内获得了生物送货系统,生物传递系统,生物卷曲韦伯斯特,Johnson&Johnson公司,Irwindale,California)和MRI图像(西门子3T,西门子医疗保健,德国)。 MRI标记用于确定圆周菌株(ECC)和延迟增强,以获得局部瘢痕范围(%)。自定义软件用于测量来自AEMM导管TIP的运动场的ECCAND局域应变(LAS)。对于ECCWA的良好(R2?= 0.80),偏见(0.01个应变单元)和狭窄的协议限制(r2?= 0.80)和狭窄的协议限制0.03〜0.06)。与非卡段相比,瘢痕段显示出较低的绝对应变幅度:ECC(中位数[第一至第三四分位数]:Nonscar?0.10 [?0.15至0.15至06]与疤痕?0.04 [06〜02])和LAS(?0.20 [?0.27至0.14]与η.09[〜0.14至0.14])。 AEMM菌株准确地区分疤痕和非网区段,特别是LAS(曲线下的面积:0.84,精度?= 0.76),其优于峰值 - 峰值电压(Nonscar 9.5 [6.5至13.3] MV与疤痕5.6 [3.4至8.3] MV;曲线下的区域:0.75)。 LAS和峰到峰值电压的组合导致86%的精度。结合集成的AEMM方法可以准确地确定局部变形并与瘢痕范围相关。这种方法在诊断,递送心内疗法中具有潜在的潜在应用,以及它们的血管内评估。省略了省略的摘要

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号