首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Lidocaine medicated plaster, an additional potential treatment option for localized post-surgical neuropathic pain: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
【24h】

Lidocaine medicated plaster, an additional potential treatment option for localized post-surgical neuropathic pain: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

机译:Lidocaine药物膏药,额外的潜在治疗选择,用于局部手术后神经性疼痛:随机,安慰剂对照试验的疗效和安全结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (lidocaine plaster) compared to placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSNP). Methods: Patients (n = 363) with a diagnosis of PSNP for a minimum of 3 months to 36 months were randomized (1:1) to lidocaine plaster or placebo for a 12 week double-blind treatment period. Randomization was stratified as "plaster-only" (no concomitant medication for PSNP) or as "add-on" (stable systemic medication for PSNP). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in 24 hour average pain intensity at Week 12, assessed by 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS). The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01752322) and EudraCT (2012-000347-28). Results: Treatment with lidocaine or placebo plaster led to a clinically relevant reduction in average pain intensity. Pain reduction (least squares mean [LS mean] standard error [SE], [95% confidence interval, CI]) with lidocaine plaster (-1.70 [0.16], [-2.03, -1.38]) was numerically higher than with placebo (-1.47 [0.16], [-1.78, -1.15]) but the difference was not statistically significant (-0.23 [0.23], [-0.69, 0.22]). Pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses showed the largest differentiation between lidocaine and placebo in patients without concomitant pain medication, and in patients with more than 1 year between surgery and enrollment. Many secondary outcomes showed a numerically larger improvement in favor of lidocaine. The most commonly reported adverse events were administration site reactions linked to topical administration. Conclusions: A clinically relevant pain reduction was observed with lidocaine plaster in patients with PSNP. The safety and tolerability profile is consistent with current knowledge.
机译:目的:评估利多卡内700毫克药膏(利多卡因膏药)的疗效和安全性与中度至严重慢性手术后神经治疗疼痛(PSNP)的安慰剂相比。方法:患者(n = 363)诊断为PSNP至少3个月至36个月的诊断(1:1)到利多卡因石膏或安慰剂12周双盲治疗期。随机化被分层为“仅限膏药”(不伴随PSNP的药物)或作为“加载项”(稳定的全身用药用于PSNP)。主要疗效终点是在第12周的24小时平均疼痛强度的基线变化,由11点数值评定量表(NRS)评估。该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01752322)和Eudract(2012-000347-28)中注册。结果:用利多卡因或安慰剂膏药治疗导致平均疼痛强度的临床相关降低。用LIDOCAIE石膏(-1.70 [0.16],[-2.03],[-2.03,-1.38])的疼痛减少(最小二乘性的标准误差[LS平均值]标准误差[95%置信区间,CI]),数值高于安慰剂( -1.47 [0.16],[-1.78,-1.15]但差异在统计学上没有统计学意义(-0.23 [0.23],[-0.69,0.22])。预先指定的探索性亚组分析显示Lidocaine和Lavelbo之间的患者在没有伴随的疼痛药物的患者中的最大差异,并且在手术和入学之间超过1年的患者。许多二次结果表明LIDOPAIE的青睐的数量更大的改善。最常见的不良事件是与局部给药有关的给药遗址反应。结论:PSNP患者的利多卡因石膏观察到临床相关的疼痛还原。安全性和宽容性概况与当前的知识一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号