首页> 外文期刊>Culture, medicine and psychiatry >Beyond V40.31 : Narrative Phenomenology of Wandering in Autism and Dementia
【24h】

Beyond V40.31 : Narrative Phenomenology of Wandering in Autism and Dementia

机译:超越V40.31:在自闭症和痴呆症中徘徊的叙事现象学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Research on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and on Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and other types of dementia describes a behaviour called ‘wandering’, a term that denotes movement through space lacking intention or exact destination, as when a person is disoriented or not self-aware. In the U.S., ‘wandering’ in both ASD and AD has been examined mostly from a management and prevention perspective. It prioritizes safety while primarily overlooking personal experiences of those who ‘wander’ and their families, thus limiting the range of potentially effective strategies to address this issue. Communicative challenges faced by many people diagnosed with ASD and AD further obscure the experiential, existential aspects of ‘wandering’. This article reflects an increasing concern of social science scholars interested in whether and how the conceptual and practical strategies to address ‘wandering’ are informed by the situated experiences of people with cognitive and developmental disabilities and their families. We examine ‘wandering’ at the intersections of personal experience, family life, clinical practice, public health policy, and legislation, as a conceptually rich site where notions of personhood, subjectivity, intentionality, and quality of life powerfully and consequentially converge to impact the lives of many people with ASD and AD, and their families. We draw upon critical autism studies describing how attributions of personhood, subjectivity, intentionality, rational agency, and moral autonomy of people with ASD have been contingent upon the norms and conventions governing movement of the human body through space (Hilton, Afr Am Rev 50(2):221–235, 2017). When this movement is deemed aberrant, the person may be construed as irrational, a danger to self because of a lack of self-awareness, and a danger to others because of a lack of empathy. These attributions put the person at risk of being excluded from the considerations and, more importantly, the obligations of the ‘moral community’ to ensure that he or she has a ‘good human life’ (Barnbaum, The Ethics of Autism: Among Them but not of Them. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 2008; Silvers and Francis, Metaphilosophy 40(3/4):475–498, 2009). Using ethnographic, narrative phenomenological (Mattingly, The Paradox of Hope: Journeys through a Clinical Borderland. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010), and medical humanities (Charon, JAMA 286:1897–1902, 2001; Narrative Medicine: Honoring the Stories of Illness. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006) approaches, we examine multiple perspectives on ‘wandering’ in ASD and AD across narrative discourse genres, institutional contexts, and media of representation. We argue for an extension of the prevention and management view to focus not only on safety but also on what phenomenologist Merleau-Ponty (1962) called “having a world” (p. 146). The analysis is intended to inform clinical practice, policy and public health efforts to enhance understanding of first and second person perspectives on ‘wandering’ in order to improve the participation and quality of life of people with ASD and AD who ‘wander’, and their families.
机译:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)和其他类型的痴呆症描述了一种称为“徘徊”的行为,一个术语表示通过缺乏意图或精确目的地的空间的运动,就像一个人迷失方向或者不是自我时-意识到的。在美国,在ASD和AD中的“徘徊”主要来自管理和预防的观点。它优先考虑安全,同时主要忽视那些“漫游”及其家庭的个人经历,从而限制了解决这个问题的潜在有效策略的范围。许多诊断为ASD和广告的许多人面临的交际挑战进一步掩盖了“徘徊”的体验性,存在各方面。本文反映了社会科学学者对社会科学学者的越来越多的关注,这些学者是否以及如何通过认知和发展残疾人及其家庭的人们所经历的概念和实践战略。我们在个人经验,家庭生活,临床实践,公共卫生政策和立法中审视“徘徊”,作为一个概念性的富有的网站,其中概念的概念,主观性,有趣性和生活质量有源性,其次融合的概念,并相应地融合与ASD和AD的许多人以及他们的家人生活。我们借鉴了批判性的自闭症研究,描述了拟合人物,主观性,故意,理性机构以及亚摩特人民的道德自治的临界研究已经取决于人体通过太空的规范和公约(Hilton,AFR AFR 50( 2):221-235,2017)。当这种运动被视为异常时,这个人可能被解释为非理性,因为缺乏自我意识而对自己的危险,以及别人因为缺乏同理心而危险。这些归属将该人面临被免于考虑因素的风险,更重要的是,“道德社区”的义务确保他或她有“良好的人生生命”(Barnbaum,自闭症的伦理:其中不在于。印第安纳大学出版社,布卢明顿,2008年;银矿和弗朗西斯,MetaphiloOphy 40(3/4):475-498,2009)。使用民族造影,叙事现象学(消退,希望的悖论:通过临床边境旅程。伯克利:加州大学出版社,2010年)和医疗人文学科(夏隆,Jama 286:1897-1902,2001;叙事医学:讲述故事纽约:纽约:牛津大学出版社,2006年出版社,我们在叙述话语流派,机构背景和代表媒体上审查了在ASD和AD中“徘徊”的多种观点。我们争辩延长预防和管理观点,不仅关注安全性,而且侧重于安全性,而且还关注什么是梅洛 - Ponty(1962)称为“拥有世界”(第146页)。分析旨在提供临床实践,政策和公共卫生努力,以加强对“徘徊”的第一和第二人称视角的理解,以提高与ASD和AD的人民的参与和生活质量和他们家庭。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号