首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study
【24h】

Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study

机译:支持ICU中持续维持治疗方法的决策过程的框架:Delphi研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Objectives: To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. Design: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. Setting: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. Patients: Not applicable. Interventions: Not applicable. Measurements and Main Results: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. Conclusions: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality.
机译:文本中提供了补充数字内容。目标:制定一项共识框架,可以指导在ICU患者的持续或限制持续或限制终身治疗的过程,使用了来自多个国家的护理人员,患者和代理决策者的基于证据的项目。设计:采用来自13个国家的专家进行了一个先验的基于网络的国际德尔福共识研究,并与专家进行了专家。与会者审查了七分李克特规模或开放式问题的决策过程的项目。有关术语,内容和决策步骤的问题问题。随后的回顾,概述了结果(包括平均分)和专家建议。设置:代表ICU医师,护士,前ICU患者和代理决策者的国际参与者的基于网络的国际参与者调查。患者:不适用。干预措施:不适用。测量和主要结果:分别在三轮,分别为28,28和27(33名邀请的)医生,与12,10和七(19个邀请的)护士一起参加。患者和替代品涉及第一个和12个中的27个反应。护理人员主要在北欧的大学附属医院工作。在Delphi进程期间,大多数项目被修改以达成共识。三轮后七项缺​​乏共识。最终共识框架包括四个元素的内容和时序;三个要素专注于照顾者代理沟通(入场会议,后续会议,观察目标会议);和一个元素(每周超时会议)重点是评估专业人员ICU治疗的偏好,预后和比例。结论:医生,护士,患者和代理人产生了一种基于共识的框架,以指导在ICU中继续或限制持续维持治疗的决策过程。早期,频繁和预定的家庭会议与重复的多学科超时会议相结合,可以支持与患者偏好,预后和相称相关的决策。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Critical care medicine》 |2020年第5期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University;

    Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University;

    Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University;

    Critical Care Department CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias Corporacion Sanitaria Universitaria Parc;

    Intensive Care Services Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Herston QLD Australia;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medizin Campus Bodensee Tettnang Hospital;

    Department of Intensive Care Adults Erasmus University Medical Center;

    Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Neurocríticos e Trauma Hospital de S?o José Centro Hospitalar de;

    Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Neurocríticos e Trauma Hospital de S?o José Centro Hospitalar de;

    Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Parma University Hospital;

    Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit Hospital de S?o Francisco Xavier CHLO;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Oslo University hospital;

    Department of Medical Humanities Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 护理学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 00:10:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号