首页> 外文期刊>Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica: Official Publication of the Nordisk Forening for Obstetrik och Gynekologi >Comment on 'Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction'.
【24h】

Comment on 'Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction'.

机译:评述“剖宫产术中深接合胎头的脱离:传统方法与反向臀位提取”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have read the short report 'Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction' by Chopra et al. (1). We would like to thank the authors for their efforts and the data they shared with us. We thought a few comments would be helpful to the readers. Obstetricians working in busy maternity hospitals or tertiary centers have come across 'the deeply engaged head in advanced labor situation' and know the stress it is associated with. Dislodging the deeply engaged head, especially after prolonged labor, may be a real challenge and has many complications; therefore, one should understand that neither pushing nor pulling maneuvers are easily performed, and they require extreme care and expertise.
机译:我们阅读了Chopra等人的简短报告“剖宫产时深切胎头的脱离:高级方法与传统的臀位提取法”。 (1)。我们要感谢作者的努力以及与我们分享的数据。我们认为一些评论对读者会有所帮助。在繁忙的妇产医院或三级医院工作的妇产科医生遇到了“精疲力竭的高级劳动头目”,并且知道这种压力会带来怎样的压力。尤其是长时间工作后,松开深陷的头部可能是一个真正的挑战,并且有很多并发症。因此,应该理解,推和拉动作既不容易执行,又需要极其谨慎和专业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号