...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during caesarean section in advanced labor: patwardhan versus push extraction
【24h】

Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during caesarean section in advanced labor: patwardhan versus push extraction

机译:剖宫产术中深切接合的胎儿头在高级分娩中的脱离:帕德沃汗与推挤

获取原文

摘要

Background: To compare the maternal and neonatal morbidities between the ?Patwardhan? technique and the ?Push? method for extraction of the foetus in second stage caesarean sections. Methods: Retrospective cohort study was done at PESIMSR, Kuppam, AP from MAY 2012 to APRIL 2015. Women with single fetus at term in anterior vertex position, with the head deeply impacted in pelvis and needing cesarean delivery where included in the study. Group 1 consists of all cases in which extraction of fetus was done by Patwardhan technique and Group 2, in whom extraction of fetus was done by push method and extracted as vertex. Objective of the study was to assess selective complications like extension of the incision, injury to the surrounding structures, excessive bleeding, need for blood transfusion and the fetal outcome between the two groups. Results: Out of 98 cases reviewed, 46 belonged to group A (Patwardhan) and 52 belonged to group B (push). Patients in the push group had statistically significant higher rates of maternal morbidity in terms of uterine extension and other related complications. However; there were no differences in neonatal outcomes in both the groups. Conclusions: While complications are inherent in both methods, Patwardhan method of delivery of the fetus for second stage labour has been shown to confer considerable advantage in prevention of maternal morbidity over the push method in our institution. Our findings support the fact that the Patwardhan method could be a useful maneuver in intraoperative disengagement of fetal head, when encountered at second stage CS and it is our opinion that the Patwardhan manoeuvre can be practiced selectively as a primary technique.
机译:背景:比较“帕德汉”(Patwardhan)的母婴发病率。技术和“推”?第二阶段剖腹产胎儿的方法。方法:回顾性队列研究于2012年5月至2015年4月在AP SR,Kuppam,AP进行。足月前胎位单胎的妇女,其头部深深受骨盆影响,需要剖宫产。第1组包括所有情况,其中通过Patwardhan技术完成了胎儿的抽取,第2组包括了通过推压方法完成并以顶点抽取的胎儿。该研究的目的是评估两组之间选择性的并发症,如切口扩展,周围结构损伤,出血过多,输血需求和胎儿结局。结果:在回顾的98例病例中,有46例属于A组(Patwardhan),而52例属于B组(推送)。就子宫扩张和其他相关并发症而言,推推组患者的孕产妇发病率在统计学上显着较高。然而;两组的新生儿结局无差异。结论:尽管两种方法都固有并发症,但帕特瓦尔德分娩的第二阶段分娩方法在预防孕产妇发病方面比在我们机构中具有明显优势。我们的发现支持以下事实:在第二阶段CS时,Patwardhan方法可能是术中分离胎儿头部的一种有用方法,并且我们认为,Patwardhan方法可以有选择地作为一种主要技术进行练习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号