首页> 外文期刊>BioTechniques >Method to Identify Biases in PCR Amplification of T-Cell Receptor Variable Region Genes
【24h】

Method to Identify Biases in PCR Amplification of T-Cell Receptor Variable Region Genes

机译:T细胞受体可变区基因PCR扩增中鉴定偏倚的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods have been used to establish the relative frequencies of expression of T-cell receptor (TCR) beta (B) and alpha (A) variable (V) gene families in vitro and in various tissues in vivo. This quantitative approach is difficult as it is influenced by factors inherent in the PCR, and quantitation must be performed during the exponential phase of DNA amplification (8). An additional potential problem is that variation in the amplification efficiencies ofdifferent TCR segments is possible with several of the commonly used PCR methods (8). If these amplification biases are not corrected for, they could lead to spurious conclusions as to relative TCR segment expression levels in blood or in another tissuefrom an individual. Some investigators (1,5) have assumed that amplification biases do not occur and that different primer pairs amplify different TCRV gene segments with equal efficiencies. Others, aware of the potential problem, have compared the relative levels of expression of particular TCR segments between individuals or between tissues in an individual (3). In a variation of this latter approach, Lovebridge et al. (6) controlled for the amounts of starting TCRB constant (C) region templates and then compared TCRBV gene expression between different individuals. No quantitative PCR method reliably establishes the relative expression levels of different TCR segments in a tissue from a particular individual. We report a simple method to do this. Themethod assesses the relative efficiencies of priming of TCRBV (BV) segments when using a set of sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) BV primers, and we describe a method to correct for amplification biases.
机译:定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法已用于建立体外和体内各种组织中T细胞受体(TCR)β(B)和α(A)可变(V)基因家族表达的相对频率。这种定量方法很困难,因为它受PCR固有因素的影响,并且定量必须在DNA扩增的指数期进行(8)。另一个潜在的问题是,几种常用的PCR方法可能会导致不同TCR片段的扩增效率发生变化(8)。如果不对这些扩增偏倚进行校正,则它们可能导致关于血液或个体其他组织中相对TCR片段表达水平的虚假结论。一些研究者(1,5)假设不会出现扩增偏差,并且不同的引物对以相同的效率扩增不同的TCRV基因片段。其他人意识到潜在的问题,已经比较了个体之间或个体中组织之间特定TCR片段表达的相对水平(3)。在后一种方法的一种变体中,Lovebridge等人。 (6)控制起始TCRB恒定(C)区域模板的数量,然后比较不同个体之间的TCRBV基因表达。没有定量PCR方法能够可靠地确定来自特定个体的组织中不同TCR片段的相对表达水平。我们报告了执行此操作的简单方法。当使用一组序列特异性寡核苷酸(SSO)BV引物时,该方法评估TCRBV(BV)片段引发的相对效率,我们描述了一种校正扩增偏差的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号