首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica. >Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach.
【24h】

Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach.

机译:人工膝关节置换术后感染置换的结果:治疗方法的效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two-stage revision remains the gold standard in the treatment of infected knee arthroplasty. Lately, good long-term results of direct exchange arthroplasty have been reported. The purpose of this literature review is to compare the clinical outcome achieved with one-stage revision and two-stage revision with different types of spacers. METHODS: A thorough systematic review of literature was undertaken to idenepsy reports on the treatment alternatives. Papers written in English or including an English abstract, published from 1980 through 2005, and reporting either the success rate in eradication of infection or the clinical status achieved were reviewed. 31 original articles describing the results of 154 one-stage exchange arthoplasties and of 926 two-stage exchange arthoplasties were included. The depth of detail in the description of materials and methods varied markedly, making it impossible to perform a meta-analysis. Instead, a descriptive review of the results is presented. RESULTS: With a follow-up of 12-122 months, the overall success rate in eradication of infection was 73-100% after one-stage revisions and 82-100% after two-stage revisions. Reinfection rates were the lowest in series where articulating cement spacers were used, though the follow-up was relatively short. Studies using articulating spacers reported the highest average postoperative ranges of motion. Otherwise, no correlations were observed between the clinical outcome and the length of follow-up, the type of revision, or the type of spacer. The clinical outcome (knee scores and range of motion) of the one-stage revisions was no different from that of the two-stage revisions. INTERPRETATION: Two-stage exchange is an effective treatment. Mobile spacers may further improve the range of motion. More experience in one-stage revision is required in order to define its role in the management of infected knee arthroplasties.
机译:背景与目的:两阶段翻修仍然是治疗感染性膝关节置换术的金标准。最近,已经报道了直接置换关节置换术的长期良好效果。这篇文献综述的目的是比较一阶段修订和两阶段修订与不同类型间隔子的临床疗效。方法:对文献进行了系统的系统回顾,以了解关于癫痫的替代治疗方法的报告。回顾了1980年至2005年发表的用英语撰写或包括英语摘要的论文,报告了根除感染的成功率或所达到的临床状况。包括31篇原始文章,描述了154例一阶段置换置换术和926例两阶段置换置换术的结果。在材料和方法的描述中,细节的深度明显不同,因此无法进行荟萃分析。取而代之的是,对结果进行描述性审查。结果:经过12-122个月的随访,一阶段修订后根除感染的总体成功率为73-100%,两阶段修订后为82-100%。尽管随访时间相对较短,但在使用铰接式水泥垫片的系列中,再感染率最低。使用关节间隔器的研究报告了术后平均运动范围最高。否则,在临床结果与随访时间,翻修类型或间隔物类型之间未发现相关性。一阶段修订的临床结果(膝关节评分和运动范围)与两阶段修订的临床结果无差异。解释:两阶段交换是一种有效的治疗方法。移动式垫片可以进一步改善运动范围。为了确定其在感染性膝关节置换术中的作用,需要在第一阶段翻修中获得更多经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号