首页> 外文期刊>Clinical drug investigation >Effects on Satisfaction and Service Engagement of Paliperidone Palmitate Compared with Oral Paliperidone in Patients with Schizophrenia: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Effects on Satisfaction and Service Engagement of Paliperidone Palmitate Compared with Oral Paliperidone in Patients with Schizophrenia: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:与精神分裂症患者的口腔帕哌啶酮相比,对帕利替酮棕榈酸盐的满意和服务参与的影响:开放标签随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background andObjectiveClinical practice guidelines recommend antipsychotic monotherapy, including oral and long-acting formulations, in the treatment of schizophrenia. This open-label, randomized, controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability in patients with schizophrenia of once-monthly long-acting paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) compared with oral paliperidone extended release (ER), with a particular focus on satisfaction, subjective well-being, and service engagement.MethodsSeventy-two consecutive outpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-5) were randomly assigned for 6months to: (1) PP1M (50-150mg equivalent) or (2) paliperidone ER (6-12mg/day). Participants were assessed at baseline and after 6months with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM); the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics Scale (SWN-K); the Service Engagement Scale (SES); the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH); and the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score. ANOVA repeated measures was performed. Intention-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was conducted.ResultsWe found a significant within-subjects effect (trial duration) for all rating scale except for cognitive symptoms and the TSQM domain side effects. A significant effect between subjects (treatment modality) was found for the CGI negative symptoms, the TSQM domains overall satisfaction and convenience, and the SES. There were seven drop-outs (9.7%): twi due to hyperprolactinemia and five for lack of compliance.ConclusionsSignificant differences between the two formulations were found. PP1M was superior to paliperidone ER on global treatment satisfaction and convenience, on service engagement, and in reducing negative symptoms.The trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) with the code: ACTRN12618001113246.
机译:背景技术和目的练习实践指南建议抗精神单药治疗,包括口服和长效配方,治疗精神分裂症。这种开放标签,随机的受控试验,旨在评估患有一次性长效的帕利维酮棕榈酸盐(PP1M)的精神分裂症患者的疗效和耐受性,与口腔帕帕里酮延长释放(ER)相比,特别关注满意,主观福祉和服务参与。用精神分裂症(DSM-5)的方法,随机分配6个月:(1)PP1M(50-150mg等效)或(2)Paliperidone ER(6-12mg /天) 。参与者在基线评估和6个月后,治疗满意度问卷(TSQM);主观福祉在神经抑制尺度下(SWN-K);服务订婚规模(SES);临床全球印象 - 精神分裂症(CGI-SCH);以及个人和社会绩效(PSP)得分。 ANOVA反复措施进行了。进行最后观察的意图治疗分析进行。培养术中发现了所有评级效果(试验持续时间),除了认知症状和TSQM域副作用。发现受试者(治疗方式)对CGI阴性症状的显着效果,TSQM域总体满意和方便,以及SES。有七个辍学(9.7%):TWI由于高抗癌症和五个用于缺乏遵守性。发现两种配方之间的差异。 PP1M优于Paliperidone ER,以全球治疗满意度和便利性,在服务参与下以及减少消极症状。试验在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验登记处注册(ANZCTR),代码:ACTRN126180013246。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号