首页> 外文期刊>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association >Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
【24h】

Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.

机译:筛选结肠镜检查过程中近端结肠癌息肉的患病率和可变检测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy may have a greater protective effect for distal colorectal cancer (CRC) than proximal CRC. Serrated polyps are frequently located in the proximal colon, can be missed during colonoscopy, and may progress to CRC. We investigated the prevalence and endoscopist detection rates of proximal serrated polyps in a large cohort of average risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. METHODS: Screening colonoscopies performed by 15 attending gastroenterologists at 2 academic endoscopy units between 2000 and 2009 were reviewed. Serrated polyps included hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas, and traditional serrated adenomas. Endoscopist-level detection rates for adenomas and serrated polyps were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the associations of adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rates. Logistic regression was used to compare endoscopists' detection rates. RESULTS: A total of 11,049 polyps were detected in 6681 colonoscopies (adenomas: 5637, 51%; serrated: 3984, 36%; proximal serrated: 1238, 11%). The proportion of colonoscopies with at least one proximal serrated polyp was 13% (range 1%-18%). Proximal serrated polyp detection rates per colonoscopy ranged from 0.01 to 0.26. Adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rates per colonoscopy were strongly correlated (R = 0.76, P = .0005). The odds of detecting at least one proximal serrated polyp for individual endoscopists ranged from 0.05 to 0.67 compared to the highest level detector. Endoscopist (P < .0001), but not patient age (P = .76) or gender (P = .95), was associated with proximal serrated polyp detection. CONCLUSIONS: In an average-risk screening cohort, the detection of proximal serrated polyps was highly variable and endoscopist dependent. A significant proportion of proximal serrated polyps may be missed during colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy is important for the detection and resection of all polyps with neoplastic potential.
机译:背景&AIMS:结肠镜检查可能对远端结肠直肠癌(CRC)具有更大的保护作用而不是近端CRC。锯齿状息肉通常位于近端结肠中,在结肠镜检查期间可能错过,并且可能进化到CRC。我们调查了在进行筛选结肠镜检查的大型平均风险患者的大群体中近端锯齿状息肉的患病率和内窥镜检测率。方法:在2000年至2009年期间,在2000年至2009年间参加胃肠科学医生进行的筛选结肠镜检查。锯齿状息肉包括增生息肉,无梗塞腺瘤和传统的锯齿状腺瘤。计算腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的内窥镜级检测率。计算Pearson相关系数以评估腺瘤和近端锯齿息检测率的关联。逻辑回归用于比较内窥镜师的检测率。结果:6681个结肠镜检查(Adenomas:5637,51%;锯齿:3984,36%;近端锯齿:1238,11%)。具有至少一种近似锯齿状息肉的结肠镜检查的比例为13%(范围1%-18%)。每个结肠镜检查的近端脉息检测率范围为0.01至0.26。每个结肠镜检查的腺瘤和近端发生锯齿状息肉检测率强烈相关(r = 0.76,p = .0005)。与最高水平检测器相比,检测单个内窥镜师的至少一个近端锯齿状息肉的几率范围为0.05至0.67。内窥镜师(P <.0001),但不是患者年龄(p = .76)或性别(p = .95)与近端锯齿状息肉检测相关。结论:在平均风险筛查队列中,近端锯齿状息肉的检测是高度可变的,内窥镜依赖性。在结肠镜检查期间,可能会错过大量的近似癌息肉。高质量的结肠镜检查对于检测和切除具有肿瘤潜力的所有息肉的检测和切除很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号