...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association >Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
【24h】

Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.

机译:结肠镜检查期间近端结肠锯齿状息肉的患病率和变量检测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy may have a greater protective effect for distal colorectal cancer (CRC) than proximal CRC. Serrated polyps are frequently located in the proximal colon, can be missed during colonoscopy, and may progress to CRC. We investigated the prevalence and endoscopist detection rates of proximal serrated polyps in a large cohort of average risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. METHODS: Screening colonoscopies performed by 15 attending gastroenterologists at 2 academic endoscopy units between 2000 and 2009 were reviewed. Serrated polyps included hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas, and traditional serrated adenomas. Endoscopist-level detection rates for adenomas and serrated polyps were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the associations of adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rates. Logistic regression was used to compare endoscopists' detection rates. RESULTS: A total of 11,049 polyps were detected in 6681 colonoscopies (adenomas: 5637, 51%; serrated: 3984, 36%; proximal serrated: 1238, 11%). The proportion of colonoscopies with at least one proximal serrated polyp was 13% (range 1%-18%). Proximal serrated polyp detection rates per colonoscopy ranged from 0.01 to 0.26. Adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rates per colonoscopy were strongly correlated (R = 0.76, P = .0005). The odds of detecting at least one proximal serrated polyp for individual endoscopists ranged from 0.05 to 0.67 compared to the highest level detector. Endoscopist (P < .0001), but not patient age (P = .76) or gender (P = .95), was associated with proximal serrated polyp detection. CONCLUSIONS: In an average-risk screening cohort, the detection of proximal serrated polyps was highly variable and endoscopist dependent. A significant proportion of proximal serrated polyps may be missed during colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy is important for the detection and resection of all polyps with neoplastic potential.
机译:背景与目的:结肠镜检查对远端结直肠癌(CRC)的保护作用可能大于近端CRC。锯齿状息肉通常位于近端结肠,在结肠镜检查时可能会漏诊,并可能进展为CRC。我们调查了一大批接受筛查结肠镜检查的中等风险患者的近端锯齿状息肉的患病率和内镜检查率。方法:审查了2000年至2009年期间在两个学术内窥镜检查科由15位主治肠胃病学家进行的结肠镜检查的筛选。锯齿状息肉包括增生性息肉,无柄锯齿状腺瘤和传统的锯齿状腺瘤。计算内镜医师对腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的检出率。计算皮尔逊相关系数以评估腺瘤与近端锯齿状息肉检出率的关联。使用逻辑回归比较内镜医师的检出率。结果:在6681例结肠镜检查中共检出11049例息肉(腺瘤:5637,51%;锯齿状:3984,36%;近端锯齿状:1238,11%)。具有至少一个近端锯齿状息肉的结肠镜检查的比例为13%(范围为1%-18%)。每次结肠镜检查的锯齿状息肉近端检出率范围为0.01至0.26。结肠镜检查中的腺瘤和近端锯齿状息肉检出率密切相关(R = 0.76,P = .0005)。与最高水平的检测器相比,检测到至少一名内窥镜锯齿状息肉的几率在0.05到0.67之间。内镜医师(P <.0001)与患者年龄(P = .76)或性别(P = .95)无关,但与近端锯齿状息肉检测相关。结论:在一个平均风险筛查队列中,近端锯齿状息肉的检测是高度可变的,并且依赖内镜医师。结肠镜检查可能会遗漏大量的近端锯齿状息肉。高质量的结肠镜检查对于检测和切除所有具有肿瘤潜力的息肉很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号