...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical geology >Instilling New Ways of Understanding the Innovation Process: Evidence-Based Heuristics from Student Innovation Experiences
【24h】

Instilling New Ways of Understanding the Innovation Process: Evidence-Based Heuristics from Student Innovation Experiences

机译:灌输了解创新过程的新方法:基于证据的启发式学生创新经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the workplace, engineers face complex technological landscapes, critical and nuanced user needs and societal problems, and intense rivalry from competitors. To address these challenges, engineering programs have increasingly emphasized knowledge, skills, and mindsets related to innovation. Yet, innovation is a complex phenomenon (spanning diverse processes and environments), which can make it challenging to provide these opportunities and frame them within appropriate learning contexts. Recently, researchers have explored course design heuristics to bring expert reasoning, creativity, and efficiency to course design tasks. This study seeks to develop course design heuristics for innovation education by building upon two previous studies. In the first study, phenomenography supported the identification of distinct and hierarchically-varied ways of experiencing innovation among engineering students. In the second study, critical incident technique and thematic analysis led to identification of experiences that supported more comprehensive ways of experiencing innovation. In the current study, we reverse engineer heuristics by investigating instructional approaches that facilitated the critical incidents and how they supported new ways of experiencing innovation. Thirty-one undergraduate engineering students from 13 different engineering majors and over 40 distinct innovative design experiences participated in this study. Through a collaborative, inductive content analysis process, we identified 55 strategies (or what we refer to as Innovation Heuristics) evident in the critical incidents (e.g., features of instruction, the learning environment). These strategies were categorized into seven themes: (1) contextualize; (2) situate; (3) guide; (4) support; (5) challenge; (6) motivate; and (7) extend. The paper describes and details each theme and the associated Innovation Heuristics that supported innovation learning, including key examples from the data and how they may be used by instructors.
机译:在工作场所,工程师面临着复杂的技术景观,批判性和细微的用户需求和社会问题,以及竞争对手的激烈竞争。为解决这些挑战,工程方案越来越强调与创新相关的知识,技能和思维集。然而,创新是一种复杂的现象(跨越各种过程和环境),这可以使其在适当的学习环境中提供这些机会和框架来挑战。最近,研究人员已经探索了课程设计启发式,使专家推理,创造力和效率进行课程设计任务。本研究旨在通过建设两项研究,开发创新教育的课程设计启发式。在第一项研究中,现象支持识别了工程学生在创新的独特和分层多种方式。在第二次研究中,临界事件技术和主题分析导致识别支持更全面的体验创新方式的经验。在目前的研究中,我们通过调查促进关键事件的教学方法以及他们支持新的经历创新方式的教学方法来逆转工程方法。来自13名不同工程专业的三十一位本科工程学生和40多名不同的创新设计经验参加了这项研究。通过协同,归纳内容分析过程,我们确定了55项战略(或我们称之为创新启发式)在关键事件中明显(例如,教学的特征,学习环境)。这些策略被分为七个主题:(1)上下文化; (2)位于; (3)指南; (4)支持; (5)挑战; (6)激励; (7)延伸。本文介绍了每个主题和相关的创新启发式,支持创新学习,包括来自数据的关键示例以及教师如何使用它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号