...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical geology >The application of DFRC method for the analysis of carbohydrates in a peat bog: Validation and comparison with conventional chemical and thermochemical degradation techniques
【24h】

The application of DFRC method for the analysis of carbohydrates in a peat bog: Validation and comparison with conventional chemical and thermochemical degradation techniques

机译:DFRC方法在泥炭沼泽中分析碳水化合物的应用:验证与常规化学和热化学降解技术的验证及比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Traditional acid hydrolysis is the main method used for carbohydrates characterization in soils and sediments. It has been used to cleave the glycosidic bond, yielding monomers that compose polysaccharides of the noncellulosic pool (free, ligno-cellulosic and hemicellulosic carbohydrates). In this study, the widely used chemical and thermochemical degradation procedures have been compared with the derivatisation followed by reductive cleavage (DFRC) method. This method presented efficiency in specifically cleaving the aryl ether bonds, yielding for sugar moieties linked to aromatic structures (ligno-cellulosic fraction). Once applied for peat samples, some discrepancies were observed. DFRC method revealed some information about the origin of carbohydrates that was hidden from the traditional chemical and thermochemical degradation methods. Several patterns of carbohydrates have been obtained with DFRC indicating difference in the origin and/or degradation rates between monosaccharides. For xylose, it showed an increase in the catotelm (deepest layer of the peatland), indicating an angiosperm vegetation input at the early stage of the peatland formation. Ribose, commonly known as a microbial indicator, showed the same profile as for hexoses and deoxyhexoses, with acid hydrolysis. The difference in the profile yielded in the case of DFRC method, revealed its microbial input. These information were hindered from acid hydrolysis and thermochemolysis, as the first showed nearly the same profile for all monosaccharides and the second one didn't have the capacity to analyze arabinose and ribose. Generally, higher similarity was obtained between DFRC and acid hydrolysis than between DFRC and thermochemolysis. This is due to the difference of mechanisms involved in chemolytic and thermochemolytic methods. For the first group, both methods shared acid conditions and milder temperature conditions if compared to the second group. In addition thermochemolysis is performed under
机译:传统的酸水解是用于碳水化合物沉积物的碳水化合物表征的主要方法。已用于切割糖苷键,产生构成非细胞池的多糖的单体(自由,木质纤维素和半纤维素碳水化合物)。在这项研究中,已经将广泛使用的化学和热化学降解程序与衍生化进行了比较,然后通过还原切割(DFRC)方法。该方法呈现效率特别切割芳基醚键,从而产生与芳族结构(木质纤维素级分)连接的糖部分。一旦申请泥炭样品,观察到一些差异。 DFRC方法揭示了一些关于传统化学和热化学降解方法隐藏的碳水化合物起源的信息。已经使用DFRC获得了几种碳水化合物的碳水化合物,表明单糖之间的起源和/或降解速率的差异。对于木糖,它显示出Catotelm(泥炭地最深层)的增加,表明在泥炭地形成的早期阶段的Agiosperm植被投入。核糖,通常称为微生物指示剂,显示出与酸水解的己糖和脱氧氧化相同的型材。在DFRC方法的情况下产生的轮廓的差异显示其微生物输入。这些信息受到酸水解和热化学溶解的影响,因为第一个显示所有单糖的几乎相同的型材,第二种概况和第二个没有能够分析阿拉伯糖和核糖。通常,在DFRC和酸水解之间获得更高的相似性,而不是DFRC和热化学溶解。这是由于化学溶解和热化学溶解方法所涉及的机制的差异。对于第一个组,与第二组相比,这两种方法都会共享酸条件和温和的温度条件。此外,在下面进行热化学溶解

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号