首页> 外文期刊>Current Psychology >Feedback, Confidence, and False Recall in the DRMRS Procedure
【24h】

Feedback, Confidence, and False Recall in the DRMRS Procedure

机译:DRMRS程序中的反馈,信心和错误召回

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the Deese-Roediger-McDermott-Read-Solso (DRMRS) procedure, participants recall word lists constructed around central concepts that are not on the lists. Seventy participants were given experimentally manipulated feedback (positive, negative or none) about their performance after three lists (Block 1), and were then tested on six lists (Blocks 2 and 3). Feedback had an effect on general confidence and on confidence associated with recall for each list, but not on confidence associated with the recall of individual words. However, feedback did not affect memory performance on Blocks 2 and 3, particularly false recall. In addition, higher natural confidence in Block 1 was not associated with subsequent memory performance, particularly false recall. These results cast doubt on the suggestion that false recall can be affected by feedback, and are consistent with reports of a weak relationship or no relationship between confidence and memory performance.
机译:在Deese-Roediger-McDermott-Read-Solso(DRMRS)过程中,参与者回想起围绕不在列表上的中心概念构建的单词列表。在三个清单(方框1)之后,对70名参与者进行了关于他们的表现的实验性操作反馈(正面,负面或没有),然后在六个清单(方框2和3)上进行了测试。反馈对每个列表的总体置信度和与召回相关的置信度都有影响,但对与各个单词的召回相关的置信度没有影响。但是,反馈不会影响块2和块3的内存性能,尤其是错误的回忆。此外,对块1的更高自然置信度与随后的内存性能(尤其是错误的回忆)无关。这些结果使人们怀疑错误的回忆可能受到反馈的影响,并且与关于信心和记忆力之间的弱关系或无关系的报道一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号