首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Will my job be safe if i defend my patients?: When patient advocacy collides with employment law
【24h】

Will my job be safe if i defend my patients?: When patient advocacy collides with employment law

机译:如果我捍卫患者,我的工作会安全吗?:当患者倡导与就业法碰撞时

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Physicians are moving increasingly from self-employed, private practices to at-will employment relationships. This historic change in the organizational administration of medical services is likely to accelerate as the Affordable Care Act is implemented and as accountable care organizations permeate the medical marketplace. Physicians vow an ascendant oath to safeguard patients' welfare, but as they become employees, they may sign legal contracts that also oblige obedience to the institutions that hire them. What happens when an employer makes a decision that is not in the best interests of patients and the physicians fulfill their Hippocratic obligation to voice dissent on their patients' behalf rather than abiding by their contractual obligation to obey their employer? This article explores the philosophical and legal ramifications of this potential collision of obligations to patients and to employers.
机译:医生正在越来越多地从自雇人员中移动,私人实践到就业关系。 由于实施了实惠的护理法案,并作为负责管理组织渗透了医疗市场,因此这一历史性的医疗服务的改变可能会加速。 医生誓要宣誓宣誓保护患者的福利,但随着他们成为员工,他们可能会签署法律合同,这也要求聘请雇用它们的机构。 当雇主做出不符合患者的最佳利益的决定时会发生什么,而医生履行其希波克拉底义务代表他们的患者对声音相对不同意,而不是遵守他们的合同义务来遵守雇主? 本文探讨了对患者和雇主的义务碰撞这一潜在违法行为的哲学和法律。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号