首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Will my job be safe if i defend my patients?: When patient advocacy collides with employment law
【24h】

Will my job be safe if i defend my patients?: When patient advocacy collides with employment law

机译:如果我为患者辩护,我的工作会安全吗?:当患者权益倡导与劳动法相抵触时

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Physicians are moving increasingly from self-employed, private practices to at-will employment relationships. This historic change in the organizational administration of medical services is likely to accelerate as the Affordable Care Act is implemented and as accountable care organizations permeate the medical marketplace. Physicians vow an ascendant oath to safeguard patients' welfare, but as they become employees, they may sign legal contracts that also oblige obedience to the institutions that hire them. What happens when an employer makes a decision that is not in the best interests of patients and the physicians fulfill their Hippocratic obligation to voice dissent on their patients' behalf rather than abiding by their contractual obligation to obey their employer? This article explores the philosophical and legal ramifications of this potential collision of obligations to patients and to employers.
机译:医师正日益从个体经营,私人执业转变为自愿雇佣关系。随着《平价医疗法案》的实施以及负责任的护理组织渗透到医疗市场中,医疗服务组织管理的历史性变化可能会加速。医生誓言要捍卫患者的福祉,但是他们在成为雇员时可能会签署法律合同,也必须服从雇用他们的机构。如果雇主做出的决定不符合患者的最佳利益,并且医生履行希波克拉底式的以患者的名义代其表示异议,而不是遵守其服从雇主的合同义务,会发生什么情况?本文探讨了这种对患者和雇主的潜在义务冲突的哲学和法律后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号