...
【24h】

Comparison of two mean-field based theoretical analysis methods for SIS model

机译:基于SIS模型的两个平均场理论分析方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highlights?For SIS model, exploring the difference between classical mean-field theory and simulation.?A new equation based on classical MF theory equation, which is more consistent with the simulation, is proposed.?Taylor’s expansion is applied to compare the computation of critical infection rate λc.?A case study on small-world networks is proceeded to verify the results.AbstractEpidemic spreading has been intensively studied in SIS epidemic model. Although the mean-field theory of SIS model has been widely used in the research, there is a lack of comparative results between different theoretical calculations, and the differences between them should be systematically explained. In this paper, we have compared different theoretical solutions for mean-field theory and explained the underlying reason. We first describe the diff
机译:<![cdata [ 突出显示 对于SIS模型,探讨了经典平均字段理论与仿真之间的差异。 基于经典MF理论方程的新方程,提出了与模拟更符合的。 < CE:PARA ID =“para0003”视图=“全部”>应用泰勒的扩展,以比较临界感染率的计算λ c 小世界网络的案例研究继续验证结果。 抽象 在SIS流行模式中已经集中研究了流行病。尽管SIS模型的平均场理论已被广泛用于研究,但不同的理论计算之间缺乏比较结果,并且应该系统地解释它们之间的差异。在本文中,我们对平均场理论进行了比较了不同的理论解决方案,并解释了基本原因。我们首先描述差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号