Comparative effectiveness research applied to medical devices: Which PFO closure device is the best?

Won Hoyoun; Carroll John D.

首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Comparative effectiveness research applied to medical devices: Which PFO closure device is the best?

【24h】

Comparative effectiveness research applied to medical devices: Which PFO closure device is the best?

机译：对比较有效性研究适用于医疗器械：哪种PFO闭合装置最好？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions》 |2020年第3期|共2页
作者
Won Hoyoun; Carroll John D.;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of MedicineAurora Colorado;

Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of MedicineAurora Colorado;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类心脏、血管（循环系）疾病;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Comparative effectiveness research applied to medical devices: Which PFO closure device is the best? [J] . Won Hoyoun, Carroll John D. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions . 2020,第3期

机译：对比较有效性研究适用于医疗器械：哪种PFO闭合装置最好？
2. Rescue of CardioSEAL PFO closure device malposition with Amplatzer PFO closure device at time of initial implantation. [J] . Hubbard R, Blankenship J, Haldis T Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions . 2007,第2期

机译：初次植入时，使用Amplatzer PFO闭合装置可以挽救CardioSEAL PFO闭合装置的不良位置。
3. A propensity score-matched comparison between Cardia and Amplatzer PFO closure devices - insights from the SOLUTION registry (Swiss percutaneOus patent foramen ovale cLosUre in recurrent clinical events prevenTION) [J] . Puricel Serban, Arroyo Diego, Goy Jean-Jacques, EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology . 2015,第2期

机译：心脏和Amplatzer PFO闭合装置之间的倾向得分匹配比较-来自SOLUTION注册表的见解（在预防复发性临床事件中，瑞士percutaneOus卵圆孔闭合）
4. Mult-I/O - a middleware multi input and output for access devices: A case study applied the biomedical devices [C] . Lacerda Joao M.T., Bezerra Heitor U., Valentim Ricardo A. M., 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society . 2010

机译：Mult-I / O-用于访问设备的中间件多输入和输出：案例研究应用了生物医学设备
5. Statistical Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research of Medical Devices. [D] . Kunz, Lauren Margaret. 2015

机译：医疗器械比较有效性研究的统计方法。
6. Safety and Effectiveness of Closure Devices Applied to a Stented Common Femoral Artery: A Retrospective Analysis [O] . Nicolas W. Shammas, Gail A. Shammas, Thomas Harris, 2016

机译：闭合支架置入股总动脉的安全性和有效性：回顾性分析
7. A propensity score-matched comparison between Cardia and Amplatzer PFO closure devices - insights from the SOLUTION registry (Swiss percutaneOus patent foramen ovale cLosUre in recurrent clinical events prevenTION) [O] . Puricel Serban-George, Arroyo Diego Andoni, Goy Jean-Jacques, 2014

机译：心脏和Amplatzer PFO闭合装置之间的倾向得分匹配比较-来自SOLUTION注册表的见解（在预防复发性临床事件中，瑞士percutaneOus卵圆孔未闭）
8. EMC Design Effectiveness in Electronic Medical Prosthetic Devices. [R] . Mitchell, J. C., Hurt, W. D., Steiner, T. O. 1975

机译：电子医疗假肢装置的EmC设计有效性。

Comparative effectiveness research applied to medical devices: Which PFO closure device is the best?

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅