首页> 外文期刊>Cytopathology >Randomized controlled trial evaluating rapid pre-screen of cervical cytology specimens.
【24h】

Randomized controlled trial evaluating rapid pre-screen of cervical cytology specimens.

机译:评估宫颈细胞学标本的快速预筛选的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A randomized controlled trial of 75 355 cervical cytology specimens was performed comparing rapid pre-screen with no pre-screen. While the percentage of cases receiving a final report of definite high-grade abnormality was higher in the no pre-screen arm (no pre-screen = 0.70%, pre-screen = 0.65%), the percentage of cases receiving a final report of possible or definite high-grade abnormality was essentially identical in the two arms of the trial (no pre-screen = 1.22%, pre-screen = 1.21%). In the randomized trial, one extra cytology report of definite high-grade abnormality was made for every 12 568 slides pre-screened. This level of benefit was reduced by about half when rapid pre-screen was adopted as a routine laboratory practice.
机译:进行了75 355个宫颈细胞学标本的随机对照试验,比较了快速预筛查和不进行预筛查。在没有进行筛查的前臂中,收到明确的高度异常最终报告的病例所占的百分比较高(没有进行筛查前的比率为0.70%,进行筛查前的比率为0.65%),但接受筛查的最终报告中所占的比率为在试验的两个方面,可能或确定的高度异常基本相同(无预筛查= 1.22%,预筛查= 1.21%)。在这项随机试验中,每筛选12 568张载玻片,就可获得一份明确的高度异常的额外细胞学报告。当采用快速预筛作为常规实验室操作时,这种收益水平降低了大约一半。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号