首页> 外文期刊>Cytopathology >Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
【24h】

Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.

机译:液基细胞学可以提高子宫颈抹片检查读者的效率:这是两个NHS细胞学实验室进行的时间调查的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Cervical screening programmes in England and Wales were advised by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in 2003 to adopt liquid-based cytology (LBC) in place of conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology to facilitate laboratory efficiency. Pilot evaluations in England and Scotland monitored daily or weekly workloads of smear readers and concluded that LBC could increase hourly throughput rates. This study, instead, used timing surveys to determine screening rates. Methods: Two National Health Service cytology laboratories in Manchester and Stockport were partially converted to the LBC ThinPrep((R)) process for a cervical screening trial. Three 1-week timing surveys were conducted over 7 months. The surveys covered all LBC-trained staff. The first survey in Manchester also covered staff undertaking conventional Pap screening. The smear readers used timers to record time taken for examining and reporting each slide. Results: In Manchester, in the first survey, nearly 1 minute per slide was saved by the LBC method during primary microscopy. In both laboratories, the mean microscopy time for primary screening of LBC slides was reduced by almost 1 minute between the first and second surveys. There was no difference between the second and third surveys. Microscopy by cytopathologists was also 1 minute per slide quicker with LBC than conventional Pap. The LBC inadequate rates for both laboratories were <2.0%. Organizational factors impacted on the hourly LBC primary screening rates in the laboratories, the rate for Stockport being higher than the rates in the pilot evaluations. Conclusions: The timing surveys confirm that the LBC ThinPrep((R)) technology can improve laboratory efficiency. However, decision-makers should also consider the overall costs and benefits of introducing the technology in screening programmes, including the capital investment and workforce implications.
机译:目的:2003年,美国国家临床卓越研究所建议英格兰和威尔士进行宫颈筛查计划,以采用液基细胞学(LBC)代替常规的Papanicolaou(Pap)细胞学,以提高实验室效率。英格兰和苏格兰的飞行员评估监测了涂片阅读器的每日或每周工作量,并得出结论认为,LBC可以提高每小时的吞吐率。相反,该研究使用时间调查来确定筛选率。方法:将曼彻斯特和斯托克波特的两个国家卫生服务细胞学实验室部分转换为LBC ThinPrep(R)工艺,以进行子宫颈筛查试验。在7个月内进行了3次为期1周的计时调查。这些调查涵盖了所有接受LBC培训的人员。曼彻斯特的第一次调查还涵盖了进行常规巴氏筛查的人员。涂片读取器使用计时器来记录检查和报告每张幻灯片所花费的时间。结果:在曼彻斯特,第一次调查中,在初级显微镜检查中,通过LBC方法将每张载玻片节省了近1分钟。在两个实验室中,第一次和第二次调查之间,用于初次检查LBC载玻片的平均显微镜检查时间减少了近1分钟。第二和第三次调查之间没有差异。与传统的Pap相比,使用LBC进行细胞病理学家的显微镜检查每片玻片还快1分钟。两个实验室的LBC不足率均低于2.0%。组织因素影响了实验室中每小时LBC初级筛查率,Stockport的筛查率高于试点评估中的率。结论:时间调查证实LBC ThinPrep(R)技术可以提高实验室效率。但是,决策者还应考虑在筛选程序中引入该技术的总体成本和收益,包括资本投资和对劳动力的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号