...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer epidemiology >Non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in prevention of colorectal cancer in people aged 40 or older: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in prevention of colorectal cancer in people aged 40 or older: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药预防40岁或以上的人的结直肠癌:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is still insufficient data about the risk-benefit profile about recommending non-aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NA-NSAIDs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention, especially in people aged 40 years or older. This study specifically addressed the association between regular NA-NSAIDs use and CRC risk in the population aged 40 years or older, performing a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies on this topic until April 2018, by a search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of science databases and clinical trial registries. Two reviewers independently selected studies based on predefined inclusion criteria and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Otawa scale. The data was combined with the random effects model. Potential heterogeneity was calculated as Q statistic and I-2 value. A total of 23 studies involving more than 1 million subjects contributed to the analysis. Pooled odds ratio (OR) of NA-NSAIDs effects on CRC risk was 0.74 (0.67-0.81), I-2 = 75.9%, p 0.001. Heterogeneity was explained by a number of variables including the quality of the studies. Significant protective effects of NA-NSAIDs use were found for women (risk reduction of 19%), higher doses (risk reduction of 18%), distal colon cancer (risk reduction of 22%) and white people (risk reduction from 31% to 41%). From the results NA-NSAIDs use appears to be CRC chemopreventive for a specific subgroup of the population.
机译:关于建议非阿司匹林,非甾体抗炎药(NA-NSAID)预防非阿司匹林,非甾体抗炎药(Na-NSAID)的风险福利概况的数据仍然不足,特别是在40岁或以上的人。本研究特别讨论了40岁或以上的人口中常规NA-NSAIDS使用和CRC风险之间的关联,在2018年4月之前对所有公布的研究进行了全面的系统审查和荟萃分析,并通过搜索了PubMed, Scopus和科学数据库和临床试验登记处。两位审稿人根据预定义的纳入标准独立选择研究,并使用纽卡斯尔奥卫栏规模评估研究质量。数据与随机效果模型相结合。潜在的异质性被计算为Q统计和I-2值。共有23项涉及超过100万科目的研究促成了分析。对CRC风险的Na-NSAIDS影响的汇集的差距(或)为0.74(0.67-0.81),I-2 = 75.9%,P& 0.001。通过包括研究质量的多个变量解释了异质性。对妇女(风险降低19%)发现Na-NSAIDS使用的显着保护作用,更高剂量(风险降低18%),远端结肠癌(风险降低22%)和白人(风险降低31% 41%)。从结果,NA-NSAIDS使用似乎是CRC化学预防,用于人口的特定亚组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号