...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America >Interpretations of Reservoir-Induced Seismicity May Not Always Be Valid: The Case of Seismicity during the Impoundment of the Kremasta Dam (Greece, 1965-1966)
【24h】

Interpretations of Reservoir-Induced Seismicity May Not Always Be Valid: The Case of Seismicity during the Impoundment of the Kremasta Dam (Greece, 1965-1966)

机译:储层诱导的地震性的解释可能并不总是有效:克雷玛斯大坝蓄水期间的地震病例(希腊,1965-1966)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Kremasta seismic sequence in western Greece is one of the most commonly cited examples of reservoir-induced seismicity (RIS). Here, we show that this sequence is a result of normal tectonic activity and that only some small, unrelated microseismic events are reservoir induced. Shortly after the beginning of the impoundment of the Kremasta Dam in 1965, the then newly established seismic monitoring network in Greece recorded two M-s = 6.0 events and numerous small shocks spread over a 120-km-wide region. These were interpreted as a single seismic sequence (namely the Kremasta seismic sequence) and assumed to be reservoir induced. We revisit the epicenter locations of these events and interpret them in the framework of the regional tectonic context and the local hydrogeology. Placing these events into the local context shows that they represent an amalgamation of separate, ordinary (tectonic) seismic sequences. Further, the regional rocks are highly fragmented by small faults and the spatial distribution of seismic events is not consistent with a model of stress transfer from reservoir loading. In addition, it is not likely that events at such long ( 20-30 km) distances from the reservoir could be induced by an initial reservoir load head of 30 m. Although the larger magnitude events are tectonic, after impoundment local residents reported an unusual frequency of small microseismic events felt only within 10 km of the dam. We provide evidence that these are a result of the collapse of numerous shallow karstic cavities adjacent and beneath the reservoir due to increased water load (locally 100-150 m depth). This study has significant implications for interpretation of seismic triggering mechanisms in other regions: earthquake occurrence within the proximity of reservoirs during and after impoundment time cannot be assumed to be RIS unless supported by seismological, geological, and hydrogeological evidence.
机译:希腊西部的Kremasta地震序列是储层诱导的地震性(RIS)最常见的例子之一。在这里,我们表明该序列是正常构造活动的结果,并且只有一些小的无关的微震事件是储层诱导的储层。在1965年克雷玛斯大坝蓄积后不久,希腊的新建立地震监测网络录得两种M-S> = 6.0事件和众多小冲击在120公里范围内传播。这些被解释为单个地震序列(即Kremasta地震序列),并假设是储层诱导的。我们重新审视这些事件的震中地点,并在区域构造背景和当地水文地质的框架中解释它们。将这些事件放入本地上下文表明它们代表了对单独的普通(构造)地震序列的融合。此外,区域岩石由小故障高度分散,地震事件的空间分布与从储层负载的压力转移模型不一致。此外,在储存器的距离距离(& 20-30公里)的比较不太可能是由30米的初始储层负载头引起的。虽然较大的幅度事件是构造的,但在蓄水期当地居民报告的情况下,额外的小微震事件频率仅在大坝10公里内。我们提供了证据表明,由于水负荷增加(局部100-150米深度),这些是储层附近且下方的许多浅岩间腔坍塌的结果。本研究对其他地区的地震触发机制解释具有重大影响:除非由地震,地质和水文地质证据提供支持,储存时间内储存时间和后储存时间的接近地震发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号