...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ quality & safety >How do stakeholders experience the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in hospitals? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies
【24h】

How do stakeholders experience the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in hospitals? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

机译:利益相关者如何经历在医院采用电子处方系统? 品质研究的系统审查与主题综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electronic prescribing (ePrescribing) or computerised provider/physician order entry (CPOE) systems can improve the quality and safety of health services, but the translation of this into reduced harm for patients remains unclear. This review aimed to synthesise primary qualitative research relating to how stakeholders experience the adoption of ePrescribing/CPOE systems in hospitals, to help better understand why and how healthcare organisations have not yet realised the full potential of such systems and to inform future implementations and research.We systematically searched 10 bibliographic databases and additional sources for citation searching and grey literature, with no restriction on date or publication language. Qualitative studies exploring the perspectives/experiences of stakeholders with the implementation, management, use and/or optimisation of ePrescribing/CPOE systems in hospitals were included. Quality assessment combined criteria from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist and the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Data were synthesised thematically.79 articles were included. Stakeholders’ perspectives reflected a mixed set of positive and negative implications of engaging in ePrescribing/CPOE as part of their work. These were underpinned by further-reaching change processes. Impacts reported were largely practice related rather than at the organisational level. Factors affecting the implementation process and actions undertaken prior to implementation were perceived as important in understanding ePrescribing/CPOE adoption and impact.Implementing organisations and teams should consider the breadth and depth of changes that ePrescribing/CPOE adoption can trigger rather than focus on discrete benefits/problems and favour implementation strategies that: consider the preimplementation context, are responsive to (and transparent about) organisational and stakeholder needs and agendas and which can be sustained effectively over time as implementations develop and gradually transition to routine use and system optimisation.
机译:电子规定(EPRESCRIBING)或计算机化提供商/医师订单输入(CPOE)系统可以提高卫生服务的质量和安全性,但这将这一危害的翻译仍不清楚。该审查旨在综合与利益相关者如何经历过医院的ePrescing / CPOE系统的主要定性研究,以帮助更好地了解为什么医疗组织尚未实现此类系统的全部潜力,并告知未来的实施和研究。我们系统地搜索了10个书目数据库和额外的引用搜索和灰色文学来源,没有限制日期或出版物语言。包括探索利益攸关方具有实施,管理,使用和/或优化医院ePrescribing / CPOE系统的视角/经验的定性研究。质量评估与关键评估技能计划定性清单的合并标准以及报告定性研究指南的标准。基于主题合成数据。将包含物品。利益攸关方的观点反映了作为其工作的一部分的eprescribing / cpoe的混合积极和负面影响。这些通过进一步达到的变化过程基础。报告的影响在很大程度上是相关的,而不是在组织层面进行。影响实施前的实施过程和行动的因素被认为是在了解EPRESCRIBIS / CPOE采用和影响方面的重要性。实现组织和团队应考虑ePrescribing / CPOE采用可以触发的宽度和深度,而不是专注于离散的福利/问题和有利于实施策略:考虑预体外背景,响应于(和透明)组织和利益攸关方的需求和议程,并且随着实施的发展和逐步过渡到常规使用和系统优化,可以有效地持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号