首页> 外文期刊>Acta Crystallographica, Section B. Structural Science >Recognizing the (false symmetry) triclinic (aP) to (true symmetry) centred monoclinic (mC) pathology
【24h】

Recognizing the (false symmetry) triclinic (aP) to (true symmetry) centred monoclinic (mC) pathology

机译:识别(假对称)三斜(aP)到(真对称)中心单斜(mC)病理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Some fifty-odd published examples of corrections from (false symmetry) triclinic to (true symmetry) centred monoclinic (aP to mC) are analysed to see whether the need for correction of symmetry should have been obvious to the original investigators. We conclude that about two-thirds of the examples were transparent in that special features of the dimensions of the reduced triclinic cell should have aroused the suspicions of the investigator. For the other third, calculation of the metric tensor would have indicated the possibility of symmetry higher than triclinic. However, it should always be remembered that the true symmetry of a crystal is revealed by intensity rather than by metric relationships, or by other techniques such as optical microscopy.
机译:分析了大约五十种已发表的从(假对称)三斜晶到(真对称)中心单斜(aP到mC)校正的例子,以了解对原始研究者是否应该明显需要校正对称性。我们得出的结论是,大约三分之二的示例是透明的,因为还原的三斜细胞的尺寸的特殊特征应该引起研究人员的怀疑。对于其他三分之一,度量张量将表明比三斜线更高的对称性可能性。但是,应始终记住,晶体的真实对称性是通过强度而不是通过度量关系或其他技术(例如光学显微镜)揭示的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利