首页> 外文期刊>Acta endoscopica >Impact of the role of hospital physicians in colorectal cancer screening [Impact du r?le des médecins hospitaliers dans le dépistage du cancer colorectal]
【24h】

Impact of the role of hospital physicians in colorectal cancer screening [Impact du r?le des médecins hospitaliers dans le dépistage du cancer colorectal]

机译:医院医师在大肠癌筛查中的作用的影响[医院医师在大肠癌筛查中的作用的影响]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Too many patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are still diagnosed when they are already symptomatic. In our hospital, many patients have been attending various departments in the years before the diagnosis of CRC, but never had CRC screening. We studied whether specially targeting information to hospital specialists might enhance CRC screening awareness. Methods: We studied the knowledge and implication of hospital physicians before and after a specially targeted information campaign about CRC screening in our hospital. We conducted two paper questionnaire surveys at 12-month interval. The results were compared to the colonoscopy activity of our endoscopy unit. Results: Participation was 55% in the first survey and 51% in the second survey. Knowledge about screening principles was fairly good. A large majority of physicians (90%) declared adhering personally to CRC screening. However, only 40% of physicians recommended screening frequently or regularly to patients (after the campaign: 50%, NS). Colonoscopies raised 11% in the 6 months after the campaign. Conclusion: The large majority of hospital physicians report adhering personally to CRC screening guidelines. However, this translates only infrequently into screening recommendations for their patients. One-off information campaigns may help change specialist physicians' attitudes but have only a small impact on CCR screening attendance.
机译:目的:已经有很多大肠癌(CRC)症状的患者仍被诊断出。在我们的医院中,在诊断出CRC之前的几年中,许多患者曾就诊于各个部门,但从未进行过CRC筛查。我们研究了专门针对医院专家的信息是否可以增强CRC筛查的意识。方法:我们在针对我院进行CRC筛查的有针对性的信息运动之前和之后,研究了医院医生的知识和含义。我们每隔12个月进行两次纸质问卷调查。将结果与我们内窥镜部门的结肠镜检查活性进行了比较。结果:第一次调查的参与率为55%,第二次调查为51%。关于筛选原理的知识非常好。绝大多数医师(90%)宣布坚持接受CRC筛查。但是,只有40%的医生建议对患者进行定期或定期的筛查(运动后:50%,NS)。竞选结束后的6个月内,结肠镜检查的人数提高了11%。结论:绝大多数医院医生都报告自己遵守CRC筛查指南。但是,这很少会转化为针对其患者的筛查建议。一次性的信息运动可能有助于改变专科医生的态度,但对CCR筛查的出席率影响很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号