...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Agriculturae Slovenica >Comparison of methods for relative quantification of gene expression using real-time PCR
【24h】

Comparison of methods for relative quantification of gene expression using real-time PCR

机译:实时荧光定量PCR基因表达相对定量方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has become a widely used tool for quantifying gene expression. Several methods for relative quantification have been developed, enabling rapid and reliable detection and quantification of specific nucleic acids. Thesemethods, based on qPCR include: the standard curve method, the efficiency calibrated method and the 2 method. Here we analyzed if these three methods generate comparable results. To evaluate their performance, we analyzed the expression of the nucleasegene MS53_0284 from Mycoplasma synoviae type strain WVU 1853 during in vitro infection of CEC-32 cells, using qPCR. As determined, all three methods generated comparable and reliable results when all necessary conditions were fulfiled. Also, the efficiency calibrated and the standard curve method were more suitable for quantifying small differences in relative gene expression than the 2"AACq method.
机译:实时定量PCR(qPCR)已成为一种广泛用于定量基因表达的工具。已经开发了几种用于相对定量的方法,从而能够快速可靠地检测和定量特定核酸。基于qPCR的这些方法包括:标准曲线法,效率校准法和2种方法。在这里,我们分析了这三种方法是否产生了可比的结果。为了评估其性能,我们使用qPCR分析了CEC-32细胞体外感染过程中滑膜支原体型菌株WVU 1853的核酸酶基因MS53_0284的表达。如所确定的,当满足所有必要条件时,所有三种方法均产生了可比较且可靠的结果。同样,与2“ AACq方法相比,校准的效率和标准曲线方法更适合于定量相对基因表达的细微差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号