首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >SNAPPS-Plus: An educational prescription for students to facilitate formulating and answering clinical questions
【24h】

SNAPPS-Plus: An educational prescription for students to facilitate formulating and answering clinical questions

机译:SNAPPS-Plus:针对学生的教育处方,可帮助制定和回答临床问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To analyze the content and quality of PICO-formatted questions (Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome), and subsequent answers, from students' educational prescriptions added to the final SNAPPS Select step (SNAPPS-Plus). Method: Internal medicine clerkship students at the University of Minnesota Medical Center were instructed to use educational prescriptions to complement their bedside SNAPPS case presentations from 2006 to 2010. Educational prescriptions were collected from all eligible students and coded for topic of uncertainty, PICO conformity score, presence of answer, and quality of answer. Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient was used to compare ordinal variables, Kruskal-Wallis test to compare distribution of PICO scores between groups, and McNemar exact test to test for association between higher PICO scores and presence of an answer. Results: A total of 191 education prescriptions were coded from 191 eligible students, of which 190 (99%) included a question and 176 (93%, 176/190) an answer. Therapy questions constituted 59% (112/190) of the student-generated questions; 19% (37/190) were related to making a diagnosis. Three-fifths of the questions (61%, 116/190) were scored either 7 or 8 on the 8-point PICO conformity scale. The quality of answers varied, with 37% (71/190) meeting all criteria for high quality. There was a positive correlation between the PICO conformity score and the quality of the answers (Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient = 0.726; P < .001). Conclusions: The SNAPPS-Plus technique was easily integrated into the inpatient clerkship structure and guaranteed that virtually every case presentation following this model had a well-formulated question and answer.
机译:目的:分析来自PICO格式的问题(患者干预比较结果)的内容和质量,以及后续答案,方法是将学生的教育处方添加到最终的SNAPPS选择步骤(SNAPPS-Plus)中。方法:明尼苏达大学医学中心的内科文科学生被指示使用教育处方来补充他们从2006年至2010年在床旁的SNAPPS病例报告。从所有符合条件的学生中收集教育处方,并针对不确定性,PICO合格评分,答案的存在和答案的质量。使用Spearman等级相关系数比较序数变量,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较两组间PICO分数的分布,使用McNemar精确检验检验较高PICO分数与答案的存在之间的关联。结果:191名合格学生总共编写了191个教育处方,其中190个(99%)包括一个问题,176个(93%,176/190)包括一个问题。治疗问题占学生提出的问题的59%(112/190); 19%(37/190)与做出诊断有关。五分之三的问题(61%,116/190)在8分PICO合格评分中得分为7分或8分。答案的质量各不相同,其中37%(71/190)符合所有高质量标准。 PICO合格分数与答案质量之间存在正相关(Spearman等级相关系数= 0.726; P <.001)。结论:SNAPPS-Plus技术很容易集成到住院医生的业务结构中,并确保遵循该模型的几乎所有病例陈述都具有精心设计的问答方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号