...
首页> 外文期刊>Czech Journal of Food Sciences >Comparison of the Results of the ELISA, Histochemical, and Immunohistochemical Detection of Soya Proteins in Meat Products
【24h】

Comparison of the Results of the ELISA, Histochemical, and Immunohistochemical Detection of Soya Proteins in Meat Products

机译:肉制品中大豆蛋白的ELISA,组织化学和免疫组织化学检测结果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This work compares the commonly used immunochemical methods for soya protein detection and alternative microscopic methods. Immunochemical methods were represented by the competitive ELISA method. Histochemical and immunohistochemical methods were used for microscopical examination. From a group of 252 meat products, each sample was examined for soya proteins by ELISA, histochemical, and immunohistochemical methods. The products came from the following categories: cooked sausages, ham, dry cooked sausages, and fermented sausages. The results showed that the highest accuracy was achieved by immunohistochemical examination. However, in the category of cooked sausages, this result was not statistically significant. Since the results in the individual categories differed, our results demonstrate that one single method does not always provide reliable and completely objective results. Immunohistochemical methods seem to be the most suitable for the verification of the reference immunochemical method results and prevention of false results.
机译:这项工作比较了用于大豆蛋白检测的常用免疫化学方法和其他微观方法。免疫化学方法以竞争性ELISA法为代表。组织化学和免疫组织化学方法用于显微镜检查。从252种肉类产品中,通过ELISA,组织化学和免疫组织化学方法检查每个样品中的大豆蛋白。产品来自以下类别:熟香肠,火腿,干熟香肠和发酵香肠。结果表明,通过免疫组织化学检查可获得最高的准确度。但是,在煮香肠类别中,此结果在统计上并不显着。由于各个类别的结果不同,因此我们的结果表明,一种方法并不总是提供可靠且完全客观的结果。免疫组织化学方法似乎最适合验证参考免疫化学方法的结果并防止错误的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号