...
首页> 外文期刊>Accreditation and quality assurance >Bioanalytical method validation and its implications for forensic and clinical toxicology-A review
【24h】

Bioanalytical method validation and its implications for forensic and clinical toxicology-A review

机译:生物分析方法验证及其对法医和临床毒理学的意义-综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The reliability of analytical data is very important to forensic and clinical toxicologists for the correct interpretation of toxicological findings. This makes (bio)analytical method validation an integral part of quality management and accreditation in analytical toxicology. Therefore, consensus should be reached in this field on the kind and extent of validation experiments as well as on acceptance criteria for validation parameters. In this review, the most important papers published on this topic since 1991 have been reviewed. Terminology, theoretical and practical aspects as well as implications for forensic and clinical toxicology of the following validation parameters are discussed: selectivity (specificity), calibration model (linearity), accuracy, precision, limits, stability, recovery and ruggedness (robustness).
机译:分析数据的可靠性对于法医和临床毒理学家正确解释毒理学发现非常重要。这使得(生物)分析方法验证成为分析毒理学质量管理和认证不可或缺的一部分。因此,应该在该领域就验证实验的种类和范围以及验证参数的接受标准达成共识。在这篇综述中,对自1991年以来发表的有关该主题的最重要论文进行了综述。讨论了以下验证参数的术语,理论和实践方面以及法医和临床毒理学的含义:选择性(特异性),校准模型(线性),准确性,精度,极限,稳定性,回收率和耐用性(稳健性)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号