...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Neurological Sciences: Official Bulletin of the World Federation of Neurology >Efficacy and safety of NABOTA in post-stroke upper limb spasticity: A phase 3 multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of NABOTA in post-stroke upper limb spasticity: A phase 3 multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

机译:Nabota在卒中后上肢痉挛中的疗效和安全性:相3多中心,双盲,随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Botulinum toxin A is widely used in the clinics to reduce spasticity and improve upper limb function for post-stroke patients. Efficacy and safety of a new botulinum toxin type A, NABOTA (DWP450) in post-stroke upper limb spasticity was evaluated in comparison with Botox (onabotulinum toxin A). A total of 197 patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity were included in this study and randomly assigned to NABOTA group (n = 99) or Botox group (n = 98). Wrist flexors with modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) grade 2 or greater, and elbow flexors, thumb flexors and finger flexors with MAS 1 or greater were injected with either drug. The primary outcome was the change of wrist flexor MAS between baseline and 4 weeks post-injection. MAS of each injected muscle, Disability Assessment Scale (DAS), and Caregiver Burden Scale were also assessed at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the injection. Global Assessment Scale (GAS) was evaluated on the last visit at 12 weeks. The change of MAS for wrist flexor between baseline and 4 weeks post-injection was - 1.44 +/- 0.72 in the NABOTA group and - 1.46 +/- 0.77 in the Botox group. The difference of change between both groups was 0.0129 (95% confidence interval - 0.2062-0.2319), within the non-inferiority margin of 0.45. Both groups showed significant improvements regarding MAS of all injected muscles, DAS, and Caregiver Burden Scale at all follow-up periods. There were no significant differences in all secondary outcome measures between the two groups. NABOTA demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and safety for improving upper limb spasticity in stroke patients compared to Botox. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:肉毒杆菌毒素A广泛用于诊所以减少痉挛性,提高卒中后患者的上肢功能。与肉毒杆菌(Onabobulinum Toxin A)相比,评价了新的肉毒杆菌毒素A,Nabota(DWP450)的新肉毒杆菌毒素A,Nabota(DWP450)的疗效和安全性。本研究中包含197例患有后肢体上肢体痉挛的患者,并随机分配给Nabota组(n = 99)或肉毒杆菌基(n = 98)。用改进的Ashworth Scale(MAS)2或更大的腕部屈肌,以及带有MAS 1或更多的弯头屈肌,拇指屈肌和手指屈肌都注射了任何一种药物。主要结果是基线和注射后4周之间的腕部屈肌Mas的变化。每次注射肌肉,残疾评估规模(DAS)和护理人员负担量级也在注射后4,8和12周内评估。全球评估规模(天然气)在12周的最后一次访问时评估。基线和注射后4周之间的腕部屈肌的MA的变化为-1.44 +/- 0.72,肉毒杆菌组中的1.46 +/- 0.77。两组变化的差异为0.0129(95%置信区间 - 0.2062-0.2319),在0.45的非劣势边缘内。两组在所有后续期间都表现出关于所有注入的肌肉,DAS和护理人员负担量规模的MAS的显着改进。两组之间的所有次要结果措施没有显着差异。与肉毒杆菌毒素相比,Nabota展示了提高中风患者的上肢痉挛的非劣效性和安全性。 (c)2015 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号