...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Use of Intensive Glycemic Management in Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus
【24h】

Use of Intensive Glycemic Management in Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus

机译:在糖尿病糖尿病的老年人中使用强化血糖管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives To examine the proportion of older adults with diabetes mellitus treated with tight glucose control and the factors associated with this practice. Design Cross‐sectional analysis. Setting Outpatient sites in the Diabetes Collaborative Registry (N=151). Participants Adults aged 75 and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus (N=42,669). Measurements Participants were categorized based on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose‐lowering medications: poor control (HbA1c 9%), moderate control (HbA1c 8–9%), conservative control (HbA1c 7–8%), tight control (HbA1c 7%) with low‐risk agents (low risk for hypoglycemia), tight control with high‐risk agents, and diet control (HbA1c 7% taking no glucose‐lowering medications). We used hierarchical logistic regression to examine participant and site factors associated with tight control and high‐risk agents versus conservative or tight control and low‐risk agents. Results Of 30,696 participants without diet‐controlled diabetes, 5,596 (18%) had moderate or poor control, 9,227 (30%) had conservative control, 7,893 (26%) had tight control taking low‐risk agents, and 7,980 (26%) had tight control taking high‐risk agents. Older age, male sex, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease were each independently associated with greater odds of tight control with high‐risk agents. There were no differences according to practice specialty (endocrinology, primary care, cardiology) in how aggressively participants were managed. Conclusion One‐quarter of U.S. older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus are tightly controlled with glucose‐lowering medications that have a high risk of hypoglycemia. These results suggest potential overtreatment of a substantial proportion of people and should encourage further efforts to translate guidelines to daily practice.
机译:目的考察患有糖尿病患者的糖尿病患者的比例,用紧身葡萄糖控制和与这种做法相关的因素进行治疗。设计横截面分析。在糖尿病协作注册表中设置门诊站点(n = 151)。参与者成年人75岁及以上的2型糖尿病(N = 42,669)。测量参与者根据糖基化血红蛋白(HBA1C)和葡萄糖降低药物分类:对照(HBA1C> 9%),中等对照(HBA1C 8-9%),保守对照(HBA1C 7-8%),控制紧密( HBA1c 7%)具有低风险剂(低血糖风险低),具有高风险药物的紧密控制,以及饮食对照(HBA1c 7%不服用葡萄糖药物)。我们使用了层次逻辑回归来检查与紧密控制和高风险代理相关的参与者和站点因素与保守或紧密控制和低风险代理。结果30,696名没有饮食控制糖尿病的参与者,5,596(18%)对照中度或较差,9,227名(30%)具有保守对照,7,893(26%)具有严重的控制,低风险剂,7,980(26%)有紧张的控制,采取高风险的药剂。年龄较大,男性性别,心力衰竭,慢性肾病和冠状动脉疾病各自独立相关,具有高风险药剂的更大的严密控制。根据实践专业(内分泌学,初级保健,心脏病学)在管理方面没有差异。结论U.S.患有2型糖尿病患者的1季度患有2型糖尿病的葡萄糖药物含有高血糖风险的葡萄糖药物。这些结果表明,大量比例的人潜在过度过度,并应鼓励进一步努力将指导方针转化为日常惯例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号