【24h】

A new model of bioterrorism risk assessment.

机译:一种新的生物恐怖主义风险评估模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There has been an abundance of different bioterrorist attack scenarios and consequently an unclear biodefense strategy so far. We present a framework for bioterrorism risk assessment that we believe would be useful for policymakers and understandable without needing to be an expert in this field. We retrieved the Medline database via PubMed (from January 1987 to January 2009) and cross-referenced and reviewed the terms biological weapons, biological attacks, bioterror, bio(defense), bio(strategy) and epidemiologic models, and risk assessment. Additionally, we conducted an internet search with the same terms and strategy. We divided bioterrorist attacks into 3 categories: strategical (large-scale), operational (middle-scale), and tactical (small-scale). A bioterrorist attack is presented as a 4-component chain model, including perpetrators, agents, means of delivery, and targets. For any of these 4 components, we propose quantitative and qualitative risk assessment parameters. Here we present a simple scoring system within our model applied to the 2001 U.S. anthrax attacks.
机译:迄今为止,存在着各种各样的不同的生物恐怖袭击场景,因此目前还不清楚的生物防御策略。我们提出了一个生物恐怖主义风险评估框架,我们认为该框架对政策制定者很有用,并且无需成为该领域的专家即可理解。我们通过PubMed(从1987年1月至2009年1月)检索了Medline数据库,并交叉引用和审查了术语生物武器,生物攻击,生物恐怖,生物(防御),生物(战略)和流行病学模型以及风险评估。此外,我们使用相同的术语和策略进行了互联网搜索。我们将生物恐怖袭击分为三类:战略性(大规模),行动性(中等规模)和战术性(小型)。生物恐怖袭击以4要素链模型呈现,包括肇事者,特工,运送手段和目标。对于这四个组成部分中的任何一个,我们提出定量和定性的风险评估参数。在这里,我们介绍了适用于2001年美国炭疽热袭击的模型中的简单评分系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号