首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in rheumatology >Controversies in small vessel vasculitis--comparing the rheumatology and nephrology views.
【24h】

Controversies in small vessel vasculitis--comparing the rheumatology and nephrology views.

机译:小血管血管炎的争议-比较风湿病学和肾病学的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Over the past 20 years, remarkable progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis and treatment of patients with small vessel vasculitis. Nephrologists and rheumatologists play primary roles in the care of these patients. Whilst there are many areas of agreement between these specialists with respect to understanding and practical care of these patients, there are a number of important areas that differ in the practice patterns of nephrologic and rheumatologic practice. These areas include the nomenclature of these diseases, the role of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in the pathogenesis, the route and duration of initial cyclophosphamide administration, and, most importantly, the total duration of maintenance therapy following disease remission. Two experienced clinicians, a rheumatologist and a nephrologist, spar off in support of their opinions.
机译:在过去的20年中,在了解小血管血管炎患者的发病机理和治疗方面取得了显着进展。肾脏科和风湿科医师在这些患者的护理中起主要作用。尽管这些专家在理解和实际护理这些患者方面有许多共识,但在肾脏病和风湿病实践的模式上有许多重要领域。这些领域包括这些疾病的命名,抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体在发病机理中的作用,首次施用环磷酰胺的途径和持续时间,最重要的是,疾病缓解后维持治疗的总持续时间。两名经验丰富的临床医生,风湿病医生和肾脏病医生,为了支持他们的观点而冒口掉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号