...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized Phase II Trial of Cisplatin and Etoposide in Combination With Veliparib or Placebo for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ECOG-ACRIN 2511 Study
【24h】

Randomized Phase II Trial of Cisplatin and Etoposide in Combination With Veliparib or Placebo for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ECOG-ACRIN 2511 Study

机译:顺铂和依托泊苷的随机期II试验与Veliparib或安慰剂的广泛阶段小细胞肺癌组合:ECOG-acrin 2511研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeVeliparib, a poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitor, potentiated standard chemotherapy against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in preclinical studies. We evaluated the combination of veliparib with cisplatin and etoposide (CE; CE+V) doublet in untreated, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).Materials and MethodsPatients with ES-SCLC, stratified by sex and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, were randomly assigned to receive four 3-week cycles of CE (75 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 and 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 3) along with veliparib (100 mg orally twice per day on days 1 through 7) or placebo (CE+P). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Using an overall one-sided 0.10-level log-rank test, the study had 88% power to demonstrate a 37.5% reduction in the PFS hazard rate.ResultsA total of 128 eligible patients received treatment on protocol. The median age was 66 years, 52% of patients were men, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 for 29% of patients and 1 for 71%. The respective median PFS for the CE+V arm versus the CE+P arm was 6.1 versus 5.5 months (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [one-sided P = .06]; stratified HR, 0.63 [one-sided P = .01]), favoring CE+V. The median overall survival was 10.3 versus 8.9 months (stratified HR, 0.83; 80% CI, 0.64 to 1.07; one-sided P = .17) for the CE+V and CE+P arms, respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% versus 65.6% (two-sided P = .57) for CE+V and CE+P, respectively. There was a significant treatment-by-strata interaction in PFS: Male patients with high lactate dehydrogenase levels derived significant benefit (PFS HR, 0.34; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.51) but there was no evidence of benefit among patients in other strata (PFS HR, 0.81; 80% CI, 0.60 to 1.09). The following grade 3 hematology toxicities were more frequent in the CE+V arm than the CE+P arm: CD4 lymphopenia (8% v 0%; P = .06) and neutropenia (49% v 32%; P = .08), but treatment delivery was comparable.ConclusionThe addition of veliparib to frontline chemotherapy showed signal of efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC and the study met its prespecified end point.
机译:目的veliparib,聚(ADP核糖)聚合酶抑制剂,临床前研究中对小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的增强的标准化疗。我们评估了与顺铂和依托磷脂(Ce; Ce + v)双层在未处理的广泛阶段SCLC(ES-SCLC)的组合的组合。用ES-SCLC的材料和方法分类,被性别和血清乳酸脱氢酶水平分层,是随机的在第1天和第1天至第3天静脉内静脉内(75 mg / m(2)静脉注射3周的Ce(75 mg / m(2))以及默皮脂(每天每天两次,每天两次通过7)或安慰剂(CE + P)。主要终点是无进展的存活率(PFS)。使用整体单面0.10级日志测量测试,该研究有88%的权力,证明PFS危险率减少了37.5%。符合条件的128名符合条件的患者在议定书中获得的37.5%。中位年龄为66岁,52%的患者是男性,东方合作肿瘤学课程绩效状况为0例,患者的29%,1持71%。 Ce + v臂与Ce + p臂的相应中值PFS为6.1与5.5个月(未经用的危险比[HR],0.75 [单侧P = .06];分层HR,0.63 [单侧P = .01]),有利于Ce + v。中位数总生存率为10.3与8.9个月(分层HR,0.83; 80%CI,0.64至1.07;单面P = .17)分别用于CE + V和CE + P武器。 CE + V和CE + P分别为65.6%(双面P = .57)的总反应率为71.9%。 PFS中存在显着的逐层相互作用:男性患者高乳酸脱氢酶水平衍生出显着益处(PFS HR,0.34; 80%CI,0.22至0.51),但在其他地层中没有患者患者有益的证据( PFS HR,0.81; 80%CI,0.60至1.09)。在Ce + V臂中比Ce + P臂更频繁,CD4淋巴结(8%v 0%; p = .06)和中性粒细胞(49%V 32%; p = .08)但是治疗递送是可比较的。结论veliparib对前线化疗的增加表现出ES-SCLC患者的疗效信号,并且该研究达到了预定的终点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号