...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized International Phase III Trial of ERCC1 and RRM1 Expression-Based Chemotherapy Versus Gemcitabine/Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
【24h】

Randomized International Phase III Trial of ERCC1 and RRM1 Expression-Based Chemotherapy Versus Gemcitabine/Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

机译:随机的国际期III试验ERCC1和RRM1表达的化疗与吉西他滨/卡铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE We assessed whether chemotherapy selection based on in situ ERCC1 and RRM1 protein levels would improve survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to the trial's experimental arm, which consisted of gemcitabine/carboplatin if RRM1 and ERCC1 were low, docetaxel/carboplatin if RRM1 was high and ERCC1 was low, gemcitabine/docetaxel if RRM1 was low and ERCC1 was high, and docetaxel/vinorelbine if both were high. In the control arm, patients received gemcitabine/carboplatin. The trial was powered for a 32% improvement in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Results Of 331 patients registered, 275 were eligible. The median number of cycles given was four in both arms. A tumor rebiopsy specifically for expression analysis was required in 17% of patients. The median time from informed consent to expression analysis was 11 days. We found no statistically significant differences between the experimental arm and the control arm in PFS (6.1 months v 6.9 months) or overall survival (11.0 months v 11.3 months). A subset analysis revealed that patients with low levels for both proteins who received the same treatment in both treatment arms had a statistically better PFS (P = .02) in the control arm (8.1 months) compared with the experimental arm (5.0 months). CONCLUSION This demonstrates that protein expression analysis for therapeutic decision making is feasible in newly diagnosed patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. A tumor rebiopsy is safe, required in 17%, and acceptable to 89% (47 of 53) of patients.
机译:目的,我们评估了基于原位ERCC1和RRM1蛋白水平的化疗选择是否会改善晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者存活。患者和方法符合条件的患者被随机分配2:1至试验的实验臂,如果RRM1和ERCC1低,Docetaxel / Carboplatin,如果RRM1高,ERCC1低,则吉西他滨/多西紫杉醇如果RRM1低,则Ercc1很高,Docetaxel / Vinorelbine如果两者都很高。在控制臂中,患者接受吉西他滨/卡铂。试验在6个月的无进展生存期(PFS)中受到32%的改善。结果331名患者注册,275名符合条件。在双臂中给出的中位数的循环数是四个。 17%的患者需要专门用于表达分析的肿瘤重生。知情同意表达分析的中位时间为11天。我们发现实验臂和PFS中的控制臂之间没有统计学意义(6.1个月v 6.9个月)或整体存活(11.0个月V 11.3个月)。副本分析显示,在两种治疗臂中接受相同治疗的两种蛋白质水平患者在控制臂(8.1个月)中具有统计学上更好的PFS(P = .02),与实验臂(5.0个月)相比。结论这证明了治疗决策的蛋白质表达分析在新诊断的晚期NSCLC患者中是可行的。肿瘤重建是安全的,需要17%,并且可接受的89%(53%)患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号