...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemical Education >Thinking Processes Associated with Undergraduate Chemistry Students' Success at Applying a Molecular-Level Model in a New Context
【24h】

Thinking Processes Associated with Undergraduate Chemistry Students' Success at Applying a Molecular-Level Model in a New Context

机译:与本科化学学生在新背景下应用分子水平模型的思维过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated relationships between the thinking processes that 28 undergraduate chemistry students engaged in during guided discovery and their subsequent success at reasoning through a transfer problem during an end-of-semester interview. During a guided-discovery laboratory module, students were prompted to use words, pictures, and symbols to make their mental models of chemical compounds added to water explicit, both prior to the start (initial model) and at the end (refined model) of the module. Based on their responses to these model assignments, we characterized students' knowledge and thinking processes, including the extent to which individual students engaged in (a) constructing molecular-level models that were consistent with experimental evidence; (b) constructing molecular-level models that progressed toward scientific accuracy; (c) constructing molecular-level models that were scientifically correct; (d) making connections between laboratory observations and the molecular-level behavior of particles; (e) accurate metacognitive monitoring of how their molecular-level models changed; and (f) using evidence to justify model refinements. Analyses revealed three thinking processes that were strongly associated with correct reasoning in the transfer context during an end-of-semester interview: constructing molecular-level models that were consistent with experimental evidence, engaging in accurate metacognitive monitoring, and using evidence to justify model refinements. The extent of student engagement in these three key thinking processes predicted correct reasoning in a new context better than the scientific correctness of a student's content knowledge prior to instruction. Although we did not explore causal relationships, these results suggest that integrating activities that promote the key thinking processes identified into instruction may improve students' understanding and success at transfer.
机译:本研究调查了28名本科化学学生在引导发现期间从事的思维过程之间的关系,并通过在学期结束时通过转移问题进行后续成功。在指导发现的实验室模块期间,提示学生使用单词,图片和符号来使其精神模型在开始(初始模型)和最终(精制模型)之前添加到水中的化学化合物。模块。根据他们对这些模型作业的回答,我们描绘了学生的知识和思维过程,包括各个学生从事(a)构建与实验证据一致的分子水平模型的程度; (b)构建以科学准确性的分子水平模型; (c)构建科学校正的分子水平模型; (d)在实验室观察和颗粒的分子水平行为之间进行连接; (e)准确的元认知监测如何改变其分子水平模型; (f)使用证据证明模型改进。分析揭示了三种思维过程,与在学期结束面试期间的转移上下文中的正确推理强烈关联:构建与实验证据一致的分子级模型,从事准确的元认知监测,并使用证据证明模型改进证明模型改进。在这三个关键思维过程中的学生参与程度预测了在教学前的学生内容知识的科学正确性的新背景下的正确推理。虽然我们没有探索因果关系,但这些结果表明,整合促进指导指导的关键思维过程的活动可能会改善学生的迁移的理解和成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号