...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemical Education >Drawing for Assessing Learning Outcomes in Chemistry
【24h】

Drawing for Assessing Learning Outcomes in Chemistry

机译:用于评估化学学习结果的绘图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Extant research on the efficacy of drawing for assessing learning in chemistry suggests it may provide richer information on the quality of students' mental models. Here, we examine the relative utility of formative assessments that involve drawing modalities as well as verbal and symbolic modalities. We analyzed the drawings, written explanations, and symbolic notations made by 36 students learning about chemical reactivity from a dynamic visualization. Our analysis demonstrates that drawing affords the emphasis of different conceptual features across different representational modalities. Students represented spatiotemporal structures (i.e., particle composition and location) more frequently in their drawings but represented spatiotemporal transformations (i.e., particle motion and interaction) more frequently in their written explanations. Students represented more conceptual features in both their drawings and written explanations than they did in the symbolic notation commonly used in the chemical sciences. Our findings suggest that assessment items that involve drawing can help evaluators construct richer models of student knowledge, but they should not be used in isolation from verbal or symbolic modalities.
机译:现存研究绘画评估学习在化学中的疗效表明,它可能会提供关于学生精神模型质量的更丰富的信息。在这里,我们检查形成性评估的相对效用,涉及绘制模态以及言语和象征方式。我们分析了36名学生从动态可视化学习化学反应性的36名学生制作的图纸,书面解释和象征性符号。我们的分析表明,绘图提供了不同代表模式的强调不同的概念特征。学生在其附图中更频繁地代表了时尚结构(即,粒子组成和位置),但在其书面解释中更频繁地代表了时尚的变换(即粒子运动和互动)。学生在他们的图纸和书面解释中代表了比在化学科学常用的象征性符号中的书面解释中的更多概念特征。我们的研究结果表明,涉及绘图的评估项目可以帮助评估员构建学生知识的更丰富的模型,但不应从口头或象征方式隔离使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号