首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry >Comparison of Potent Odorants in Raw and Ripened Pu-Erh Tea Infusions Based on Odor Activity Value Calculation and Multivariate Analysis: Understanding the Role of Pile Fermentation
【24h】

Comparison of Potent Odorants in Raw and Ripened Pu-Erh Tea Infusions Based on Odor Activity Value Calculation and Multivariate Analysis: Understanding the Role of Pile Fermentation

机译:基于气味活性值计算和多变量分析的原始和成熟的PU-ERH茶输液中有效气味的比较:了解桩发酵的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Infusions prepared from raw pu-erh tea (RAPT) and ripened pu-erh tea (RIPT) showed remarkable aroma differences. Predominant odorants in RAPT and RIFT infusions were identified and compared by the combined use of gas chromatography-olfactometry, aroma extract dilution analysis, odor activity values (OAVs), and multivariate analysis. A total of 35 and 19 odorants (OAV > 1) were detected in RIPT and RAPT, respectively. Odorants in RAPT and RIPT are significantly different in both odor properties and aroma compound intensities. Overall, RAPT contained a complex variety of chemical classes with diverse odors and moderate odor intensities, while RIPT is dominated by structurally and organoleptically similar compounds with high potency. Specifically, stale and musty smelling methoxybenzenes contributed the most to RIPT, while floral-, sweet-, and woody-smelling terpene alcohols, terpene ketones, and phenolic compounds were the predominant odorants in RAPT. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis revealed that linalool, alpha-ionone, 1,2,4-trimethoxybenzene, 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-methylbenzene, 1,2,3,4-tetramethoxybenzene, and 1,2,3-trimethoxybenzene underwent remarkable changes during pile fermentation and could be used as potential odor-active markers for RIPT and RAPT discrimination. The comprehensive aroma characterization of pu-erh tea and determination of the effect of pile fermentation on odorant alteration herein will provide guidance for pu-erh tea flavor quality control and evaluation.
机译:由原始PU-ERH茶(RAPT)和成熟的PU-ERH茶(RIPT)制备的输注显示出显着的香气差异。通过组合使用气相色谱 - 嗅觉 - 嗅觉 - 嗅觉 - 嗅觉,香气提取物稀释分析,气味活性值(OAV)和多变量分析来鉴定并比较RAPT和RIFT输注中的主要气味。在RIPT和RAPT中分别检测了总共35和19臭臭(OAV> 1)。在气味特性和香气复合强度中,RAPT和RIPT的气味有显着差异。总体而言,RAPT包含一种复杂的各种化学类,具有不同的异味和温和的气味强度,而RIPT通过结构性和具有高效力的有道性相似的化合物主导。具体而言,陈旧和霉味的嗅觉甲氧基苯是ript的最多贡献,而花香,甜味和木质和木质味的萜烯醇,萜烯酮和酚类化合物是RAPT中的主要气味。正交部分最小二乘判别分析显示Linalool,α-离子,1,2,4-三甲氧基苯,1,2,3-三甲氧基-5-甲基苯,1,2,3,4-四甲氧基苯和1,2,3 - 三氧基苯并在桩发酵过程中经历了显着变化,可用作RIPT和RAPT歧视的潜在气味活性标记物。 PU-ERH茶的综合香气表征和桩发酵对本文的气味改变的效果的测定将为PU-ERH茶味道质量控制和评估提供指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号