首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial.
【24h】

Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial.

机译:手术面膜与医疗工作人员中患有嗜血液的呼吸器:随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Data about the effectiveness of the surgical mask compared with the N95 respirator for protecting health care workers against influenza are sparse. Given the likelihood that N95 respirators will be in short supply during a pandemic and not available in many countries, knowing the effectiveness of the surgical mask is of public health importance. OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical mask with the N95 respirator in protecting health care workers against influenza. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Noninferiority randomized controlled trial of 446 nurses in emergency departments, medical units, and pediatric units in 8 tertiary care Ontario hospitals. INTERVENTION: Assignment to either a fit-tested N95 respirator or a surgical mask when providing care to patients with febrile respiratory illness during the 2008-2009 influenza season. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed influenza measured by polymerase chain reaction or a 4-fold rise in hemagglutinin titers. Effectiveness of the surgical mask was assessed as noninferiority of the surgical mask compared with the N95 respirator. The criterion for noninferiority was met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the reduction in incidence (N95 respirator minus surgical group) was greater than -9%. RESULTS: Between September 23, 2008, and December 8, 2008, 478 nurses were assessed for eligibility and 446 nurses were enrolled and randomly assigned the intervention; 225 were allocated to receive surgical masks and 221 to N95 respirators. Influenza infection occurred in 50 nurses (23.6%) in the surgical mask group and in 48 (22.9%) in the N95 respirator group (absolute risk difference, -0.73%; 95% CI, -8.8% to 7.3%; P = .86), the lower confidence limit being inside the noninferiority limit of -9%. CONCLUSION: Among nurses in Ontario tertiary care hospitals, use of a surgical mask compared with an N95 respirator resulted in noninferior rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00756574
机译:背景信息:关于手术面罩的有效性的数据与N95呼吸器相比,用于保护保健工人对抗流感的呼吸稀疏。鉴于N95呼吸器将在大流行期间提供短期内的可能性,并且在许多国家没有提供的可能性,了解外科面膜的有效性是公共卫生的重要性。目的:将手术面膜与N95呼吸器进行比较保护医疗保健工作者对抗流感。设计,设定和参与者:846名紧急部门,医疗单位和8个高等教育安大略省医院的儿科单位中446名护士的非事实体随机控制试验。干预:在2008 - 2009年流感季节向患有发热呼吸疾病的患者提供护理时,分配适用测试的N95呼吸器或手术面膜。主要观察指标:主要结果是通过聚合酶链反应测量的实验室证实流感或血凝素滴度的4倍。与N95呼吸器相比,评估外科掩模的有效性作为手术面膜的不合理性。满足非闭合性的标准,如果95%置信区间(CI)的下限(N95呼吸器减去外科手术组)的降低大于-9%,则满足。结果:2008年9月23日和2008年12月8日之间,478名护士被评估了资格,并注册了446名护士,并随机分配干预;分配225以接收手术口罩和221至N95呼吸器。手术面罩组50名护士(23.6%)发生流感感染,在N95呼吸组中的48例(22.9%)(绝对风险差,-0.73%; 95%CI,-8.8%至7.3%; P =。 86),较低的置信限制在非流动下限为-9%。结论:在安大略省第三节护理医院的护士中,与N95呼吸器相比,使用手术面膜导致实验室证实流感的非流化率。试验注册:CLINCOLTRIANS.GOV标识符:NCT00756574

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号