首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation Proceedings >Comparison of the affinity column-mediated immunoassay and microparticle enzyme immunoassay methods as a tacrolimus concentration assay in the early period after liver transplantation.
【24h】

Comparison of the affinity column-mediated immunoassay and microparticle enzyme immunoassay methods as a tacrolimus concentration assay in the early period after liver transplantation.

机译:亲和柱介导的免疫测定和微粒酶免疫测定方法的比较作为肝移植早期初期的Tacolimus浓度测定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We compared the results of 2 immunoassay systems (affinity column-mediated immunoassay [ACMIA] and microparticle enzyme immunoassay [MEIA]), regarding hematologic and biochemical values at 2 weeks after liver transplantation. METHODS: We obtained 256 blood samples from 35 patients, at 2 weeks after liver transplantation, excluding those from patients who were treated with interacting medications or renal replacement therapy. We also excluded the early mortality cases within 2 weeks of liver transplantation. A Dimension RxL HM with the tacrolimus Flex reagent cartilage was used for the ACMIA and the IMx tacrolimus II for the MEIA method. RESULTS: The tacrolimus concentrations measured by the ACMIA method correlated closely with those measured by the MEIA method (r = 0.953). However, the weighted concordance correlation coefficient for the repeated-measurement design was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.85). The discrepancies in the tacrolimus level between the 2 methods was large among samples with low tacrolimus concentrations especially <5 ng/mL. When the difference ratio of the 2 methods ([ACMIA - MEIA]/ACMIA) was analyzed with a linear mixed-effects model to identify significant laboratory findings, there were no significant differences based on hematocrit, renal function, or hepatic function. However, the serum potassium level correlated with the difference ratio of the 2 methods (estimated slope, 10.173; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Both the ACMIA and the MEIA methods are precise; however, the ACMIA method has the advantage of fewer pretreatment procedures. In the early liver transplant period, however, there was a difference between the serum tacrolimus concentrations measured by the 2 methods, especially at a low drug concentrations.
机译:目的:我们将2个免疫测定系统(亲和柱介导的免疫测定[ACMIA]和微粒酶)的结果进行比较,在肝移植后2周内关于血液学和生化值的血液学和生物化学价值。方法:我们在肝移植后2周获得35例患者的256例血液样本,不包括患者与互动药物或肾置换疗法治疗的患者。我们还在肝移植后2周内排除了早期死亡病例。具有Tacrolimus Flex试剂软骨的尺寸RXL HM用于ACMIA和IMX Tacrolimus II,用于MEIA方法。结果:通过ACMIA方法测量的Tacrolimus浓度与Meia方法测量的浓度紧密相关(r = 0.953)。然而,重复测量设计的加权齐全相关系数为0.74(95%置信区间,0.66-0.85)。 2种方法之间的统治者水平之间的差异在具有低标准士浓度的样品中大,尤其是<5ng / ml。当2种方法的差异比([ACMIA - MEIA] / ACMIA)用线性混合效应模型来识别显著实验室结果进行分析,有根据血细胞比容,肾功能或肝功能没有显著差异。然而,血清钾水平与2种方法的差异比相关(估计斜率,10.173; p = .02)。结论:ACMIA和MEIA方法都是精确的;然而,ACMIA方法具有更少的预处理程序的优点。然而,在早期的肝移植期间,通过2种方法测量的血清标准血素浓度之间存在差异,特别是在低药物浓度下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号