...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett's oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial
【24h】

Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett's oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial

机译:Barrett食道(方面)的eSomeprazole和阿司匹林:随机造成的审判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundOesophageal adenocarcinoma is the sixth most common cause of cancer death worldwide and Barrett's oesophagus is the biggest risk factor. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose esomeprazole proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and aspirin for improving outcomes in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. MethodsThe Aspirin and Esomeprazole Chemoprevention in Barrett's metaplasia Trial had a 2?×?2 factorial design and was done at 84 centres in the UK and one in Canada. Patients with Barrett's oesophagus of 1 cm or more were randomised 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated schedule held in a central trials unit to receive high-dose (40 mg twice-daily) or low-dose (20 mg once-daily) PPI, with or without aspirin (300 mg per day in the UK, 325 mg per day in Canada) for at least 8 years, in an unblinded manner. Reporting pathologists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary composite endpoint was time to all-cause mortality, oesophageal adenocarcinoma, or high-grade dysplasia, which was analysed with accelerated failure time modelling adjusted for minimisation factors (age, Barrett's oesophagus length, intestinal metaplasia) in all patients in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2004-003836-77. FindingsBetween March 10, 2005, and March 1, 2009, 2557 patients were recruited. 705 patients were assigned to low-dose PPI and no aspirin, 704 to high-dose PPI and no aspirin, 571 to low-dose PPI and aspirin, and 577 to high-dose PPI and aspirin. Median follow-up and treatment duration was 8·9 years (IQR 8·2–9·8), and we collected 20?095 follow-up years and 99·9% of planned data. 313 primary events occurred. High-dose PPI (139 events in 1270 patients) was superior to low-dose PPI (174 events in 1265 patients; time ratio [TR] 1·27, 95% CI 1·01–1·58, p=0·038). Aspirin (127 events in 1138 patients) was not significantly better than no aspirin (154 events in 1142 patients; TR 1·24, 0·98–1·57, p=0·068). If patients using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were censored at the time of first use, aspirin was significantly better than no aspirin (TR 1·29, 1·01–1·66, p=0·043; n=2236). Combining high-dose PPI with aspirin had the strongest effect compared with low-dose PPI without aspirin (TR 1·59, 1·14–2·23, p=0·0068). The numbers needed to treat were 34 for PPI and 43 for aspirin. Only 28 (1%) participants reported study-treatment-related serious adverse events. InterpretationHigh-dose PPI and aspirin chemoprevention therapy, especially in combination, significantly and safely improved outcomes in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. FundingCancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, Wellcome Trust, and Health Technology Assessment.
机译:BackgroundoSophageal腺癌是全世界癌症死亡最常见的最常见原因,Barrett的食道是最大的危险因素。我们旨在评估高剂量eSomeprazole质子泵抑制剂(PPI)和阿司匹林改善Barrett食管患者的结果的疗效。 Barrett的Metaplasia审判中的Aspirin和Esomeprazole化学预防有2?×2级设计,并在英国的84个中心和加拿大一人完成。 Barrett的食管患者1厘米或更高的患者随机1:1:1:1,使用在中央试验单元中持有的计算机产生的进度,以接收高剂量(每日两次)或低剂量(每次20毫克-daily)PPI,有或没有阿司匹林(英国每天300毫克,加拿大每天325毫克)至少8年,以揭穿方式。报告病理学家被掩盖到治疗分配。主要复合端点是全导致死亡率,食管腺癌或高级发育不良的时间,其通过调整的加速故障时间建模分析,以便在意图中所有患者中的最小化因子(年龄,Barrett的食道长度,肠道脑)调整 - 对待人口。此试验以EUDRACT注册,2004-003836-77编号。 Findingsbetween 2005年3月10日,2009年3月1日,招聘了2557名患者。将705名患者分配到低剂量PPI和NOAPIRIN,704至高剂量PPI和NOSABIRIN,571至低剂量PPI和Aspirin,以及577至高剂量PPI和阿司匹林。中位后续和治疗持续时间为8·9年(IQR 8·2-9·8),我们收集了20个?095随访时间和99%·9%的计划数据。发生了313个主要事件。高剂量PPI(1270名患者的139名患者)优于低剂量PPI(1265名患者174名事件;时间比[TR] 1·27,95%CI 1·01-1·58,P = 0·038 )。阿司匹林(1138名患者的127例事件)并没有明显优于阿司匹林(1142例患者154个事件; TR 1·24,0·98-1·57,P = 0·068)。如果在首次使用时使用非甾体抗炎药物进行抑制的患者,阿司匹林明显优于阿司匹林(Tr 1·29,1·01-1·66,P = 0·043; n = 2236) 。与无阿司匹林的低剂量PPI相比,将高剂量PPI与阿司匹林相比具有最强的效果(Tr 1·59,14-2·23,P = 0·0068)。治疗所需的数字为PPI和43种阿司匹林。只有28(1%)参与者报告了学习治疗相关的严重不良事件。解释高剂量PPI和阿司匹林化学预防疗法,特别是在巴雷特食道患者中显着和安全地改善了结果。 FradingCancer研究英国,Astrazeneca,Wellcome Trust和健康技术评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号