首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for vertebral fractures – Authors' reply
【24h】

Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for vertebral fractures – Authors' reply

机译:椎体成形术与保守治疗椎骨骨折 - 作者回答

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the design of the sham studies1,2 diff ers in many ways from that of Vertos II, the results could diff er as well. Diff erential diagnosis of pain from an osteoporotic vertebral com pression fracture includes myalgia, degenerative disease, and a herniated disc. Anamnesis, physical examination, and MRI of the spine are needed to diff erentiate between these causes. According to the criteria of Vertos II, a proportion of patients in the sham studies had no indication for vertebroplasty. In the sham intervention, the use of a local anaesthetic might have resolved secondary soft tissue and facet joint pain unlikely to be aff ected by vertebroplasty.
机译:由于假期的假研究,以多种方式不同于Vertos II的差异,因此结果也可以差异。 疏松疏松椎体骨折疼痛的差异展示诊断包括肌痛,退行性疾病和椎间盘。 需要脊柱的厌氧,体格检验和这些原因之间的差异。 根据Vertos II的标准,假手术中的患者的比例没有椎体成形术。 在假干预中,使用局部麻醉剂可能已经解决了次级软组织和面关节疼痛,而不太可能被椎体成形术治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号