...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >A Comparison Between Unilateral Transverse Process-Pedicle and Bilateral Puncture Techniques in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty
【24h】

A Comparison Between Unilateral Transverse Process-Pedicle and Bilateral Puncture Techniques in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty

机译:单侧横向过程 - 椎弓根椎弓根和双侧穿刺技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Study Design. A prospective comparative study. Objective. To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using unilateral transverse process-pedicle and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). Summary of Background Data. PKP is a widely used vertebral augmentation procedure for treating painful vertebral compression fractures. A percutaneous bilateral approach is typically used to access the vertebral body. Many previous studies have reported excellent clinical results with PKP. In contrast, numerous complications and problems have also been reported, such as puncture difficulty, cement leakage, and adjacent vertebral fracture. Methods. This prospective study included 316 patients with singlelevel lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, 224 females and 92 males with a mean age of 71.5 years. Randomized patients underwent PKP using 2 different puncture techniques. The patients were followed up postoperatively and were assessed mainly with regard to clinical and radiological outcomes. Clinical outcomes were evaluated mainly using the visual analogue scale for pain and 36Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire for health status. Radiological outcomes were assessed mainly on the basis of radiation dose, bone cement distribution, vertebral body height, and kyphotic angle. Results. Patients were followed up from 12 to 28 months, with an average of 16.8 months. One hundred fifty-eight patients were treated with unilateral method and 151 patients were treated with bilateral method. In the unilateral group, the volume of the injected cement and radiation dose were significantly less than that in the bilateral group. All patients in both groups had significantly less pain after the procedures, compared with their preoperative period pain. No statistically significant differences were observed when visual analogue scale and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were compared between the groups. Both unilateral and bilateral groups showed insignificant decrease in the kyphotic angle during the follow-ups. The kyphotic angle in the unilateral group improved more significantly than in the bilateral group. In the bilateral group, 16 patients had obvious pain in the puncture sites at 1 month postoperatively caused by facet joint violation. With local block treatment, the pain disappeared in all patients at the last follow-up. Conclusion. Both bilateral and unilateral PKP are relatively safe and provide effective treatment for patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. However, unilateral PKP received less radiation dose and operation time, it also offered a higher degree of deformity correction and resulted in less complication than bilateral PKP.
机译:学习规划。潜在比较研究。客观的。评估使用单侧横向过程 - 椎弓根和双侧经皮脑膜术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的临床和放射性结果。背景数据摘要。 PKP是一种广泛使用的椎体增强程序,用于治疗痛苦的椎体压缩骨折。一种经皮双侧方法通常用于进入椎体。以前的许多研究报告了PKP的优秀临床结果。相比之下,还报告了许多并发症和问题,例如穿刺难度,水泥泄漏和相邻的椎骨骨折。方法。该前瞻性研究包括316名患有316名患有316名患有SingleLevel腰椎骨科椎骨压缩骨折,224名女性和92名男性,平均年龄为71.5岁。随机化患者使用2种不同的穿刺技术进行PKP。术后患者随访,主要在临床和放射性结果方面进行评估。评估临床结果主要使用视觉模拟规模用于疼痛和36次短型健康调查(SF-36)问卷进行健康状况。主要是在辐射剂量,骨水泥分布,椎体高度和黑色角度的基础上评估放射生理结果。结果。患者随访12至28个月,平均为16.8个月。用单侧方法治疗一百五十八名患者,并用双侧方法治疗151名患者。在单侧组中,注射水泥和辐射剂量的体积显着低于双侧组。与术前期间疼痛相比,两组患者两组患者疼痛显着较低。当在组之间比较视觉模拟规模和36项短型健康调查时,没有观察到统计学上显着的差异。单方面和双侧组都显示出在后续行动期间的黑色角度的微不足道。单侧群体中的黑色角度更加显着地比双侧组更高。在双侧群中,16名患者在术前违规术后1个月的穿刺部位疼痛。随着局部阻滞治疗,最后一次随访的所有患者都消失了疼痛。结论。双侧和单侧PKP均相对安全,为患有痛苦骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的患者提供有效的治疗方法。然而,单侧PKP接受较少的辐射剂量和操作时间,它还提供更高程度的畸形校正,并导致比双侧PKP更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号