首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Safety of Outpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement A Propensity-Matched Multi-institutional Study
【24h】

Safety of Outpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement A Propensity-Matched Multi-institutional Study

机译:门诊单级宫颈总椎间盘替代的安全匹配型多机构研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design. A retrospective cohort comparison study. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative adverse event profile of cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) performed as an outpatient relative to inpatient procedure. Summary of Background Data. Recent reimbursement changes and a push for safe reductions in hospital stay have resulted in increased interest in performing CTDRs in the outpatient setting. However, there has been a paucity of studies investigating the safety of outpatient CTDR procedures, despite increasing frequency. Methods. Patients who underwent single-level CTDR were identified in the 2005 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Outpatient versus inpatient procedure status was defined by length of stay, with outpatient being less than 1 day. Patient baseline characteristics and comorbidities were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matched comparisons were then performed for 30-day perioperative complications and readmissions between the two cohorts. In addition, perioperative outcomes of outpatient singlelevel CTDR versus matched outpatient single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) cases were compared. Results. In total, 373 outpatient and 1612 inpatient single-level CTDR procedures were identified. After propensity score matching was performed to control for potential confounders, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in perioperative complications between outpatient versus matched inpatient CTDR. Notably, the rate of readmissions was not different between the two groups. In addition, there was no difference in rates of perioperative adverse events between outpatient single-level CTDR versus matched outpatient single-level ACDF. Conclusion. The perioperative outcomes evaluated in the current study support the conclusion that, for appropriately selected patients, single-level CTDR can be safely performed in the outpatient setting without increased rates of 30-day perioperative complications or readmissions compared with inpatient CTDR or outpatient single-level ACDF.
机译:学习规划。回顾性队列比较研究。客观的。本研究的目的是研究与住院过程中作为门诊进行的宫颈总椎间盘置换替换(CTDR)的围手术期不良事件曲线。背景数据摘要。最近的报销变更和支付医院住宿的安全减少导致在门诊环境中执行CTDR的兴趣增加。然而,尽管频率增加,但缺乏调查门诊CTDR程序的安全性的研究。方法。在2005年至2016年国家外科质量改进计划数据库中确定了单层CTDR的患者。门诊与住院病程程序状态定义为逗留时间,门诊在不到1天。比较两组之间的患者基线特征和可血糖。然后在两组队列之间进行30天的围手术并发症和再生的倾向得分匹配比较。此外,比较了门诊单表演的围手术期结果与匹配的门诊单级颈椎切除术和融合(ACDF)病例进行了比较。结果。鉴定了373个门诊和1612个入住式单级CTDR程序。在对潜在混淆进行控制的情况下进行倾向分数匹配后,统计学分析显示出门诊与匹配的住院CTDR之间的围手术并发症没有显着差异。值得注意的是,两组之间的入手率并不不同。此外,门诊单级CTDR与匹配门诊单级ACDF之间的围手术期不良事件率没有差异。结论。在目前的研究支持评估,对于适当选择病人,单级CTDR可以安全地在门诊与住院CTDR或门诊单级相比,执行不增加的30天的围手术期并发症或再入院率的结论围手术期结果ACDF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号