...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Opioid pharmacovigilance: A clinical-social history of the changes in opioid prescribing for patients with co-occurring chronic non-cancer pain and substance use
【24h】

Opioid pharmacovigilance: A clinical-social history of the changes in opioid prescribing for patients with co-occurring chronic non-cancer pain and substance use

机译:阿片药物:临床 - 社会历史,对共同发生慢性非癌症疼痛和物质使用的患者阿片类药物的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is growing concern among USbased clinicians, patients, policy makers, and in the media about the personal and community health risks associated with opioids. Perceptions about the efficacy and appropriateness of opioids for the management of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) have dramatically transformed in recent decades. Yet, there is very little social scientific research identifying the factors that have informed this transformation from the perspectives of prescribing clinicians. As part of an ongoing ethnographic study of CNCP management among clinicians and their patients with co-occurring substance use, we interviewed 23 primary care clinicians who practice in safetynet clinical settings. In this paper, we describe the clinical and social influences informing three historic periods: (1) the escalation of opioid prescriptions for CNCP; (2) an interim period in which the efficacy of and risks associated with opioids were reassessed; and (3) the current period of "opioid pharmacovigilance,"characterized by the increased surveillance of opioid prescriptions. Clinicians reported that interpretations of the evidence base in favor of and opposing opioid prescribing for CNCP evolved within a larger clinicalsocial context. Historically, pharmaceutical marketing efforts and clinicians' concerns about racialized healthcare disparities in pain treatment influenced opioid prescription decisionmaking. Clinicians emphasized how patients' medical complexity (e.g. multiple chronic health conditions) and structural vulnerability (e.g. poverty, community violence) impacted access to opioids within resource limited health-care settings. This clinicalsocial history of opioid prescribing practices helps to elucidate the ongoing challenges of CNCP treatment in the US healthcare safety net and lends needed specificity to the broader, nationwide conversation about opioids. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:USBASED临床医生,患者,政策制定者以及媒体上越来越担心与阿片类药物相关的个人和社区健康风险。近几十年来,对慢性非癌症疼痛(CNCP)管理慢性非癌症疼痛(CNCP)的疗效和适当性的看法。然而,非常少的社会科学研究,识别从处方临床医生的角度而明的因素。作为临床医生和患有共同发生的物质使用患者的CNCP管理的持续民族教学研究的一部分,我们采访了23名初级保健临床医生,在临床环境中练习安全网络。在本文中,我们描述了通知三个历史时期的临床和社会影响:(1)中药物报案署的阿片类药处处方升级; (2)重新评估与阿片类药物相关的疗效和风险的临时期; (3)目前“阿片类药物药物检药”的时期,其特征在于对阿片类药物处方的升高增加。临床医生报告说,对有利的证据的解释并反对表阿磷证处的CNCP在更大的临床社会背景下进化。从历史上看,制药营销努力和临床医生对疼痛治疗中的种族化医疗差异的担忧影响了阿片类药物处方决策。临床医生强调患者的医学复杂性(例如慢性健康状况,结构漏洞(例如贫困,社区暴力)影响资源有限的保健环境中的阿片类药物。这种阿片类药物规定实践的临床社会史有助于阐明美国医疗保健安全网中有害CNCP治疗的持续挑战,并为更广泛的,全国对阿片类药物的对话提供所需的特异性。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号