首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Assessment of the efficacy of joint lavage versus joint lavage plus corticoids in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
【24h】

Assessment of the efficacy of joint lavage versus joint lavage plus corticoids in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

机译:评估膝关节骨关节炎患者的联合灌洗与联合灌洗加皮质类固醇疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Joint lavage (JL), involves the passage of cold sterile 0.9% saline through the knee joint in order to have the fluid reach the inside of the joint capsule. This technique was evaluated as a local treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee alone (JL) and in combination with intra-articular infiltration with glucocorticoids (JLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An overall 299 knees belonging to 205 patients (22% males, 78% females) with a mean age of 67 +/- 8 years and osteoarthritis of the knee of radiological grade II or III on the Kellgren scale were randomised in the ratio of 1:4 into two therapeutic groups, namely: JL (n = 62) and JLC (n = 237). All patients received joint lavage on day 0; in those of the JLC group, joint lavage was followed by infiltration of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. The efficacy of both treatments was assessed by recording the corresponding values for the following variables: pain strength as measured by a visual analogy scale (VAS), effusion, crepitation, restricted motion, of osteoarthritis of the knee. spontaneous pain, pain on pressure, pain on passive motion and pain on active motion; all of these were recorded at the onset of the study, and after 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the values of the variables at the different followup times. Also, pain severity was similar in both treatment groups. Thus, VAS for pain was 7.3 +/- 0.3 for the JL group and 7.1 +/- 0.2 for the JLC group at the onset, and decreased to 3.0 +/- 0.3 in the former and 2.8 +/- 0.2 in the latter after 1 month; the decrease was statistically significant in both cases. After 3 months, the JL and JLC groups had a VAS of 3.5 +/- 0.3 and 3.8 +/- 0.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this work suggest the absence of significant differences between the two treatments, such that both joint lavage alone and with infiltration with corticoids can be concluded as similarly effective for the symptomatic management
机译:目的:关节灌洗(JL),涉及使0.9%的冷无菌生理盐水通过膝关节,以使液体到达关节囊内部。该技术被评估为单独治疗膝关节骨关节炎(OA)和结合糖皮质激素(JLC)进行关节内浸润的局部治疗。患者和方法:将205例患者的总299膝(男性22%,女性78%)平均年龄为67 +/- 8岁,并且以Kellgren量表的放射线为II级或III级膝关节骨关节炎。将1:4的比例分为两个治疗组:JL(n = 62)和JLC(n = 237)。所有患者在第0天接受关节灌洗;在JLC组中,灌洗关节后渗入40 mg曲安奈德。通过记录以下变量的相应值来评估两种治疗的有效性:通过视觉类比量表(VAS)测量的疼痛强度,渗出液,蠕动,限制运动,膝骨关节炎。自发性疼痛,压力性疼痛,被动运动性疼痛和主动运动性疼痛;所有这些均在研究开始时以及1和3个月后记录。结果:在不同的随访时间,变量值无显着差异。此外,两个治疗组的疼痛严重程度相似。因此,JL组疼痛的VAS在发作时为7.3 +/- 0.3,JLC组为7.1 +/- 0.2,在发作后降至前者的3.0 +/- 0.3,后者为2.8 +/- 0.2。 1个月;在这两种情况下,下降均具有统计学意义。 3个月后,JL和JLC组的VAS分别为3.5 +/- 0.3和3.8 +/- 0.2。结论:这项工作的结果表明两种治疗方法之间没有显着差异,因此可以得出结论,单独进行联合灌洗和经皮质类固醇浸润均可有效地缓解症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号