...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Evolution of acute ischemic stroke therapy from lysis to thrombectomy: Similar or different to acute myocardial infarction?
【24h】

Evolution of acute ischemic stroke therapy from lysis to thrombectomy: Similar or different to acute myocardial infarction?

机译:急性缺血性卒中治疗从裂解到血栓切除术的演变:与急性心肌梗死相似或不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acute ischemic stroke remains a major global cause of death, permanent disability, and dementia. For nearly two decades, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been the only recommended therapy, albeit administered within the recommended time window(i.e., <4.5 h). However, intravenous tPA is associated with modest recanalization rates, with a majority of patients having poor functional outcomes despite timely administration. Endovascular therapy has recently been introduced as adjunctive management of acute ischemic stroke. First generation endovascular thrombectomy devices have failed to improve outcomes compared with intravenous tPA. However, recent randomized trials utilizing stent retrievers demonstrated that these devices improve functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large-artery occlusion. Introduction of stent retrieves has begun a new era for acute ischemic stroke therapy. This comprehensive review discusses the evolution of acute ischemic stroke therapy over the last two decades, with emphasis on recent randomized trials evaluating stent retrievers. Additionally, similarities and differences between the evolution of therapy in ST elevation myocardial infarction and acute ischemic stroke will be highlighted. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:急性缺血中风仍然是死亡,永久性残疾和痴呆症的主要原因。对于近二十年来,静脉内组织纤溶酶原激活剂(TPA)是唯一推荐的治疗,尽管在推荐的时间窗口(即<4.5小时)内施用。然而,静脉内TPA与适度的重速相关,尽管及时施用,绝大多数患者具有差的功能结果。最近被引入血管内疗法作为急性缺血性卒中的辅助管理。与静脉内TPA相比,第一代血管内血液切除术装置未能改善结果。然而,利用支架检索者的最近随机试验证明了这些装置在急性缺血性卒中患者中提高了急性缺血性闭塞的患者功能性结果。支架检索引入已经开始进行急性缺血性卒中治疗的新时代。这种全面的审查讨论了过去二十年中急性缺血性卒中治疗的演变,重点是最近评估支架检索的随机试验。另外,将突出ST升高心肌梗死和急性缺血性脑卒中治疗进化之间的相似性和差异。 (c)2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号